Connect with us

Features

‘Twinkle! Twinkle! Good Sir John …’

Published

on

Heard at the Club

Sir John Kotelawala, then Prime Minister visited Galle, with the members of the Airport Club, to play some tennis matches with the members of the Galle Gymkhana Club. Both teams were hosted to lunch by Justice V. T. Panditha Gunawardena, who was then presiding at the Galle Assizes, at the spacious Judge’s Bungalow.

There was a pre-lunch session of baila and Sir John threw out a challenge to the young singers: “Let’s hear you buggers sing all the bailas you know about me!”Then the baila singers began with quite a sober note: “Dudley Senanayake langadhee resignvels,

Sir John ape Premier vuna balaganilla….”

Thereafter they ripped into every baila about Sir John, and needless to say that some of them were quite outrageous, with Sir John clapping and guffawing in gay abandon.

“Hai! Hai!! Sir John giya loka savari….”

This reminds me that after the death of Premier S. W. R. D., a Policeman at Galle sang this baila:

“Dukayi kiya dukayi kiya handai lokaya!”

Aida priyae yanna giye apa duke dama!

Ara asiyathika ratawala kathanayaka

Ma piyaneka garu Bandaranaike.”

(2) Another day, Premier Sir John, while addressing a public meeting at Galle said “If Dhanayaka tries his nonsense with me, I will devour him.”

The following day Dahanayake issued a statement to the effect “At least then Sir John will have a brain in his stomach.”

(3) When W. was MSC for Bible, he was nicknamed the “Bibile Brook” because of his capacity for long speeches and hence the comparison to Tennyson’s Brook, which declared that “men may come and men may go, but I go on forever.”

In 1945 W. spoke for 13 hours making the longest speech in the legislature. (The previous record was 11½ hours by G. G. Ponnambalam).When he continued his talk on the second day it was an open secret that Sir John had damned the Brook by getting Daha’s notes “lifted” during the lunch interval, but the Brook carried on regardless.

(4) When the newly created Air Ceylon made its inaugural flight to Madras, the then Minister of Transport Sir John invited Daha to join it. That was the only time Daha left our shores.He once protested against the rationing of textiles by the Sirimavo Government, by wearing an amude (a loin cloth) to Parliament. He was not allowed to enter the Chamber but hovered there to be photographed. Rumour had it that Sir John was about place (and true to form) was searching for a pair of scissors. Fortunately it was a non-event.

(6) Here is parodist Dahanayaka on Sir John:

“I thought I saw Bubby Akka.

Shouting “Hooi” and “Haai”

I looked again and found it was

Sir John and Chou Enali”

The former rang his bell-eke And Chou said

“Never say die!

“Under the Temple Trees

He loves to lie at ease

And turns the Premier’s post

Into a dancing host.

Come hither, come hither, come hither,

Here shall you see

No policy,

But birds of the same feather”

Twinkle! Twinkle! Good Sir John,

How you’ve fooled our fair Ceylon,

Looking young in spite of age,

When the girls at

“Temple Trees”

Crowd and dance like buzzing bees,

Then you sing your sweetest song,

Twinkle! Twinkle! All night long!

But if you care to see the woe

Of starving men who come and go,

Then you’ll sing a sadder song

And twinkle! Like a wiser John.”

In ceylon’s first Parliament, one of the six nominated Mps – singleton – Salmon was a die-hard old colonialist, and one day, in the course of a speech in the House, he was lamenting the disintegration of the Empire, of which his mother – country was the head.

“For centuries” he wailed “the sun never set on the British Empire.”

Dr. Colvin quipped “That’s because God did not trust the Britisher in the dark”.

(8) Once while making one of his long speeches in Parliament, W. Dahanayaka spoke about the plight of the poor man because of the rising price of textiles, when Singleton – Salmon interrupted with: “But the prices of sarees are coming down.”

“Yes” replied W, “and as the sarees come down sarongs go up!”

(9) Another day castigating the police, in the State Council, W. said that IGP Dowbiggin should be called PIG and not IGP, when an appointed English Member sprang to his feet and demanded indignantly “What do you mean by PIG? “Police Inspector General” replied W. urbanely.

Once when SWRD was speaking in the State Council, a member remarked that the Member for Morawaka Dr. S. A. Wickremasinghe was sleeping. SWRD quipped “Let lying dogs sleep”.

Another day Dr. S. A. Wickremasinghe, the MP Akuressa was speaking on his pet subject of irrigation, when the MP for Wattala Shelton Jayasinghe interrupted him. Dr. S.A. then said “I can impart information to the Hon. Member, but I can’t give him brains to understand it.”

Then the MP for Wattala shot back. “That is quite understandable. How can the Hon. Member part with something that he hasn’t got?” Then in good humour Dr. S.A. said “That’s a good one Shelton” and proceeded with his speech.

Another day, a member related this story. A parliamentary delegation was visiting places of interest in Moscow and was at an old church where the guide showed the delegates an organ, proudly describing it as one of the oldest and most powerful instruments, when a brash young Ceylonese MP asked him in a loud voice, “What is the horse-power?”. A deafening silence followed.

“In 1970, an Act called the Condominium Property Act No. 12 of 1970, was passed in Parliament.

The Act dealt with lands, and buildings, with more than one storey. The Bill was passed without much discussion, and Minister of Housing and Construction at the time. Pieter Kueneman, commented while moving the Third Reading that not many Members took part in the discussion, maybe because they may have been deterred by the fact that the title of the Bill began with the word “condom”.

Here is another club story. Two cyclists were travelling along Anderson Road, engaged in a lively conversation when they were suddenly copped. “I looking why you were riding double breast?” said the policeman. “Ralahamy! I was only trying to overtake my friend, we were not riding abreast”, “I know you riding double abreast, don’t try joking me” said the policeman angrily.

In the circumstances, the only salvation for the two cyclists was to plead guilty, which they did. “Ole right! This time I free. Next time both ride single breast” said the cop.

When we were young children, we were delighted to listen to the stories of Andare, the Royal Court Jester. One such was this story. One day the Queen was desirous of meeting Andare’s wife. Andare then told her that his wife was short of hearing. The Queen then said that she would speak to her as loud as she for could. Back at home, Andare told his wife that the Queen wishes to meet her, adding that she as short of hearing and to speak to her in a loud voice.

When Andare went to the palace with his wife, the Queen engaged ina conversation with her in a loud voice. It soon turned out to be a noise of disturbance with each of them raising their voices. Hearing it the king and the palace officials rushed to the scene to find out what it was all about. And, it did not take long for them to realise that it was one of Andare’s pranks at work.

Several years later, a similar scene was enacted at Galle. A club member was a tourist guide and he used to take tourists to his uncle’s well-stocked jewellery shop and his uncle would give him a percentage of any sale as commission.

As time went by, he began to suspect that his commission was less than it should be, and that his uncle was defrauding him. This suspicion gained ground because his uncle never allowed him to be present during transactions.

One day he took a wealthy tourist to the shop and told his uncle in Sinhala, that the tourist was a little deaf and that he would have to speak loudly. Earlier taking a leaf of Andare’s book, he had told the tourist that his uncle was a bit deaf and that he would have to speak loud.

As was the practice our member guide stood outside the shop while the transaction was going on, but well within hearing distance. And that day he got the correct commission from his uncle, because he knew the exact amount of money that had changed hands!



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Features

The heart-friendly health minister

Published

on

Dr. Ramesh Pathirana

by Dr Gotabhya Ranasinghe
Senior Consultant Cardiologist
National Hospital Sri Lanka

When we sought a meeting with Hon Dr. Ramesh Pathirana, Minister of Health, he graciously cleared his busy schedule to accommodate us. Renowned for his attentive listening and deep understanding, Minister Pathirana is dedicated to advancing the health sector. His openness and transparency exemplify the qualities of an exemplary politician and minister.

Dr. Palitha Mahipala, the current Health Secretary, demonstrates both commendable enthusiasm and unwavering support. This combination of attributes makes him a highly compatible colleague for the esteemed Minister of Health.

Our discussion centered on a project that has been in the works for the past 30 years, one that no other minister had managed to advance.

Minister Pathirana, however, recognized the project’s significance and its potential to revolutionize care for heart patients.

The project involves the construction of a state-of-the-art facility at the premises of the National Hospital Colombo. The project’s location within the premises of the National Hospital underscores its importance and relevance to the healthcare infrastructure of the nation.

This facility will include a cardiology building and a tertiary care center, equipped with the latest technology to handle and treat all types of heart-related conditions and surgeries.

Securing funding was a major milestone for this initiative. Minister Pathirana successfully obtained approval for a $40 billion loan from the Asian Development Bank. With the funding in place, the foundation stone is scheduled to be laid in September this year, and construction will begin in January 2025.

This project guarantees a consistent and uninterrupted supply of stents and related medications for heart patients. As a result, patients will have timely access to essential medical supplies during their treatment and recovery. By securing these critical resources, the project aims to enhance patient outcomes, minimize treatment delays, and maintain the highest standards of cardiac care.

Upon its fruition, this monumental building will serve as a beacon of hope and healing, symbolizing the unwavering dedication to improving patient outcomes and fostering a healthier society.We anticipate a future marked by significant progress and positive outcomes in Sri Lanka’s cardiovascular treatment landscape within the foreseeable timeframe.

Continue Reading

Features

A LOVING TRIBUTE TO JESUIT FR. ALOYSIUS PIERIS ON HIS 90th BIRTHDAY

Published

on

Fr. Aloysius Pieris, SJ was awarded the prestigious honorary Doctorate of Literature (D.Litt) by the Chancellor of the University of Kelaniya, the Most Venerable Welamitiyawe Dharmakirthi Sri Kusala Dhamma Thera on Nov. 23, 2019.

by Fr. Emmanuel Fernando, OMI

Jesuit Fr. Aloysius Pieris (affectionately called Fr. Aloy) celebrated his 90th birthday on April 9, 2024 and I, as the editor of our Oblate Journal, THE MISSIONARY OBLATE had gone to press by that time. Immediately I decided to publish an article, appreciating the untiring selfless services he continues to offer for inter-Faith dialogue, the renewal of the Catholic Church, his concern for the poor and the suffering Sri Lankan masses and to me, the present writer.

It was in 1988, when I was appointed Director of the Oblate Scholastics at Ampitiya by the then Oblate Provincial Fr. Anselm Silva, that I came to know Fr. Aloy more closely. Knowing well his expertise in matters spiritual, theological, Indological and pastoral, and with the collaborative spirit of my companion-formators, our Oblate Scholastics were sent to Tulana, the Research and Encounter Centre, Kelaniya, of which he is the Founder-Director, for ‘exposure-programmes’ on matters spiritual, biblical, theological and pastoral. Some of these dimensions according to my view and that of my companion-formators, were not available at the National Seminary, Ampitiya.

Ever since that time, our Oblate formators/ accompaniers at the Oblate Scholasticate, Ampitiya , have continued to send our Oblate Scholastics to Tulana Centre for deepening their insights and convictions regarding matters needed to serve the people in today’s context. Fr. Aloy also had tried very enthusiastically with the Oblate team headed by Frs. Oswald Firth and Clement Waidyasekara to begin a Theologate, directed by the Religious Congregations in Sri Lanka, for the contextual formation/ accompaniment of their members. It should very well be a desired goal of the Leaders / Provincials of the Religious Congregations.

Besides being a formator/accompanier at the Oblate Scholasticate, I was entrusted also with the task of editing and publishing our Oblate journal, ‘The Missionary Oblate’. To maintain the quality of the journal I continue to depend on Fr. Aloy for his thought-provoking and stimulating articles on Biblical Spirituality, Biblical Theology and Ecclesiology. I am very grateful to him for his generous assistance. Of late, his writings on renewal of the Church, initiated by Pope St. John XX111 and continued by Pope Francis through the Synodal path, published in our Oblate journal, enable our readers to focus their attention also on the needed renewal in the Catholic Church in Sri Lanka. Fr. Aloy appreciated very much the Synodal path adopted by the Jesuit Pope Francis for the renewal of the Church, rooted very much on prayerful discernment. In my Religious and presbyteral life, Fr.Aloy continues to be my spiritual animator / guide and ongoing formator / acccompanier.

Fr. Aloysius Pieris, BA Hons (Lond), LPh (SHC, India), STL (PFT, Naples), PhD (SLU/VC), ThD (Tilburg), D.Ltt (KU), has been one of the eminent Asian theologians well recognized internationally and one who has lectured and held visiting chairs in many universities both in the West and in the East. Many members of Religious Congregations from Asian countries have benefited from his lectures and guidance in the East Asian Pastoral Institute (EAPI) in Manila, Philippines. He had been a Theologian consulted by the Federation of Asian Bishops’ Conferences for many years. During his professorship at the Gregorian University in Rome, he was called to be a member of a special group of advisers on other religions consulted by Pope Paul VI.

Fr. Aloy is the author of more than 30 books and well over 500 Research Papers. Some of his books and articles have been translated and published in several countries. Among those books, one can find the following: 1) The Genesis of an Asian Theology of Liberation (An Autobiographical Excursus on the Art of Theologising in Asia, 2) An Asian Theology of Liberation, 3) Providential Timeliness of Vatican 11 (a long-overdue halt to a scandalous millennium, 4) Give Vatican 11 a chance, 5) Leadership in the Church, 6) Relishing our faith in working for justice (Themes for study and discussion), 7) A Message meant mainly, not exclusively for Jesuits (Background information necessary for helping Francis renew the Church), 8) Lent in Lanka (Reflections and Resolutions, 9) Love meets wisdom (A Christian Experience of Buddhism, 10) Fire and Water 11) God’s Reign for God’s poor, 12) Our Unhiddden Agenda (How we Jesuits work, pray and form our men). He is also the Editor of two journals, Vagdevi, Journal of Religious Reflection and Dialogue, New Series.

Fr. Aloy has a BA in Pali and Sanskrit from the University of London and a Ph.D in Buddhist Philosophy from the University of Sri Lankan, Vidyodaya Campus. On Nov. 23, 2019, he was awarded the prestigious honorary Doctorate of Literature (D.Litt) by the Chancellor of the University of Kelaniya, the Most Venerable Welamitiyawe Dharmakirthi Sri Kusala Dhamma Thera.

Fr. Aloy continues to be a promoter of Gospel values and virtues. Justice as a constitutive dimension of love and social concern for the downtrodden masses are very much noted in his life and work. He had very much appreciated the commitment of the late Fr. Joseph (Joe) Fernando, the National Director of the Social and Economic Centre (SEDEC) for the poor.

In Sri Lanka, a few religious Congregations – the Good Shepherd Sisters, the Christian Brothers, the Marist Brothers and the Oblates – have invited him to animate their members especially during their Provincial Congresses, Chapters and International Conferences. The mainline Christian Churches also have sought his advice and followed his seminars. I, for one, regret very much, that the Sri Lankan authorities of the Catholic Church –today’s Hierarchy—- have not sought Fr.

Aloy’s expertise for the renewal of the Catholic Church in Sri Lanka and thus have not benefited from the immense store of wisdom and insight that he can offer to our local Church while the Sri Lankan bishops who governed the Catholic church in the immediate aftermath of the Second Vatican Council (Edmund Fernando OMI, Anthony de Saram, Leo Nanayakkara OSB, Frank Marcus Fernando, Paul Perera,) visited him and consulted him on many matters. Among the Tamil Bishops, Bishop Rayappu Joseph was keeping close contact with him and Bishop J. Deogupillai hosted him and his team visiting him after the horrible Black July massacre of Tamils.

Continue Reading

Features

A fairy tale, success or debacle

Published

on

Ministers S. Iswaran and Malik Samarawickrama signing the joint statement to launch FTA negotiations. (Picture courtesy IPS)

Sri Lanka-Singapore Free Trade Agreement

By Gomi Senadhira
senadhiragomi@gmail.com

“You might tell fairy tales, but the progress of a country cannot be achieved through such narratives. A country cannot be developed by making false promises. The country moved backward because of the electoral promises made by political parties throughout time. We have witnessed that the ultimate result of this is the country becoming bankrupt. Unfortunately, many segments of the population have not come to realize this yet.” – President Ranil Wickremesinghe, 2024 Budget speech

Any Sri Lankan would agree with the above words of President Wickremesinghe on the false promises our politicians and officials make and the fairy tales they narrate which bankrupted this country. So, to understand this, let’s look at one such fairy tale with lots of false promises; Ranil Wickremesinghe’s greatest achievement in the area of international trade and investment promotion during the Yahapalana period, Sri Lanka-Singapore Free Trade Agreement (SLSFTA).

It is appropriate and timely to do it now as Finance Minister Wickremesinghe has just presented to parliament a bill on the National Policy on Economic Transformation which includes the establishment of an Office for International Trade and the Sri Lanka Institute of Economics and International Trade.

Was SLSFTA a “Cleverly negotiated Free Trade Agreement” as stated by the (former) Minister of Development Strategies and International Trade Malik Samarawickrama during the Parliamentary Debate on the SLSFTA in July 2018, or a colossal blunder covered up with lies, false promises, and fairy tales? After SLSFTA was signed there were a number of fairy tales published on this agreement by the Ministry of Development Strategies and International, Institute of Policy Studies, and others.

However, for this article, I would like to limit my comments to the speech by Minister Samarawickrama during the Parliamentary Debate, and the two most important areas in the agreement which were covered up with lies, fairy tales, and false promises, namely: revenue loss for Sri Lanka and Investment from Singapore. On the other important area, “Waste products dumping” I do not want to comment here as I have written extensively on the issue.

1. The revenue loss

During the Parliamentary Debate in July 2018, Minister Samarawickrama stated “…. let me reiterate that this FTA with Singapore has been very cleverly negotiated by us…. The liberalisation programme under this FTA has been carefully designed to have the least impact on domestic industry and revenue collection. We have included all revenue sensitive items in the negative list of items which will not be subject to removal of tariff. Therefore, 97.8% revenue from Customs duty is protected. Our tariff liberalisation will take place over a period of 12-15 years! In fact, the revenue earned through tariffs on goods imported from Singapore last year was Rs. 35 billion.

The revenue loss for over the next 15 years due to the FTA is only Rs. 733 million– which when annualised, on average, is just Rs. 51 million. That is just 0.14% per year! So anyone who claims the Singapore FTA causes revenue loss to the Government cannot do basic arithmetic! Mr. Speaker, in conclusion, I call on my fellow members of this House – don’t mislead the public with baseless criticism that is not grounded in facts. Don’t look at petty politics and use these issues for your own political survival.”

I was surprised to read the minister’s speech because an article published in January 2018 in “The Straits Times“, based on information released by the Singaporean Negotiators stated, “…. With the FTA, tariff savings for Singapore exports are estimated to hit $10 million annually“.

As the annual tariff savings (that is the revenue loss for Sri Lanka) calculated by the Singaporean Negotiators, Singaporean $ 10 million (Sri Lankan rupees 1,200 million in 2018) was way above the rupees’ 733 million revenue loss for 15 years estimated by the Sri Lankan negotiators, it was clear to any observer that one of the parties to the agreement had not done the basic arithmetic!

Six years later, according to a report published by “The Morning” newspaper, speaking at the Committee on Public Finance (COPF) on 7th May 2024, Mr Samarawickrama’s chief trade negotiator K.J. Weerasinghehad had admitted “…. that forecasted revenue loss for the Government of Sri Lanka through the Singapore FTA is Rs. 450 million in 2023 and Rs. 1.3 billion in 2024.”

If these numbers are correct, as tariff liberalisation under the SLSFTA has just started, we will pass Rs 2 billion very soon. Then, the question is how Sri Lanka’s trade negotiators made such a colossal blunder. Didn’t they do their basic arithmetic? If they didn’t know how to do basic arithmetic they should have at least done their basic readings. For example, the headline of the article published in The Straits Times in January 2018 was “Singapore, Sri Lanka sign FTA, annual savings of $10m expected”.

Anyway, as Sri Lanka’s chief negotiator reiterated at the COPF meeting that “…. since 99% of the tariffs in Singapore have zero rates of duty, Sri Lanka has agreed on 80% tariff liberalisation over a period of 15 years while expecting Singapore investments to address the imbalance in trade,” let’s turn towards investment.

Investment from Singapore

In July 2018, speaking during the Parliamentary Debate on the FTA this is what Minister Malik Samarawickrama stated on investment from Singapore, “Already, thanks to this FTA, in just the past two-and-a-half months since the agreement came into effect we have received a proposal from Singapore for investment amounting to $ 14.8 billion in an oil refinery for export of petroleum products. In addition, we have proposals for a steel manufacturing plant for exports ($ 1 billion investment), flour milling plant ($ 50 million), sugar refinery ($ 200 million). This adds up to more than $ 16.05 billion in the pipeline on these projects alone.

And all of these projects will create thousands of more jobs for our people. In principle approval has already been granted by the BOI and the investors are awaiting the release of land the environmental approvals to commence the project.

I request the Opposition and those with vested interests to change their narrow-minded thinking and join us to develop our country. We must always look at what is best for the whole community, not just the few who may oppose. We owe it to our people to courageously take decisions that will change their lives for the better.”

According to the media report I quoted earlier, speaking at the Committee on Public Finance (COPF) Chief Negotiator Weerasinghe has admitted that Sri Lanka was not happy with overall Singapore investments that have come in the past few years in return for the trade liberalisation under the Singapore-Sri Lanka Free Trade Agreement. He has added that between 2021 and 2023 the total investment from Singapore had been around $162 million!

What happened to those projects worth $16 billion negotiated, thanks to the SLSFTA, in just the two-and-a-half months after the agreement came into effect and approved by the BOI? I do not know about the steel manufacturing plant for exports ($ 1 billion investment), flour milling plant ($ 50 million) and sugar refinery ($ 200 million).

However, story of the multibillion-dollar investment in the Petroleum Refinery unfolded in a manner that would qualify it as the best fairy tale with false promises presented by our politicians and the officials, prior to 2019 elections.

Though many Sri Lankans got to know, through the media which repeatedly highlighted a plethora of issues surrounding the project and the questionable credentials of the Singaporean investor, the construction work on the Mirrijiwela Oil Refinery along with the cement factory began on the24th of March 2019 with a bang and Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe and his ministers along with the foreign and local dignitaries laid the foundation stones.

That was few months before the 2019 Presidential elections. Inaugurating the construction work Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe said the projects will create thousands of job opportunities in the area and surrounding districts.

The oil refinery, which was to be built over 200 acres of land, with the capacity to refine 200,000 barrels of crude oil per day, was to generate US$7 billion of exports and create 1,500 direct and 3,000 indirect jobs. The construction of the refinery was to be completed in 44 months. Four years later, in August 2023 the Cabinet of Ministers approved the proposal presented by President Ranil Wickremesinghe to cancel the agreement with the investors of the refinery as the project has not been implemented! Can they explain to the country how much money was wasted to produce that fairy tale?

It is obvious that the President, ministers, and officials had made huge blunders and had deliberately misled the public and the parliament on the revenue loss and potential investment from SLSFTA with fairy tales and false promises.

As the president himself said, a country cannot be developed by making false promises or with fairy tales and these false promises and fairy tales had bankrupted the country. “Unfortunately, many segments of the population have not come to realize this yet”.

(The writer, a specialist and an activist on trade and development issues . )

Continue Reading

Trending