Editorial
This land like no other
Samagi Jana Balavegaya MP Hector Appuhamy noted in a parliamentary speech on Thursday that Mahinda Rajapaksa resigned on May 9 and Basil Rajapaksa quit exactly a month later on June 9. He then posed the rhetorical question: Will Gotabaya Rajapaksa step down on July 9? Apparently not. The president was very clear on this in what was described as a “wide-ranging” interview he granted the Bloomberg news agency last week. This was the first such since the smelly stuff hit the fan several weeks ago, bringing not only the Rajapaksas but the whole country to their knees. GR said clearly and unequivocally that he can’t (or won’t?) quit as “a failed president” adding that he will not run again. He is determined, at least right now, to complete his two remaining years.
The ‘Gota Go Home’ demand remains alive and kicking. The queues for fuel and gas are as interminable as they ever were. The power cuts are very much a fact of life. The prices of essentials continue to go through the roof and many everyday needs are either scarce or simply unobtainable. Though we hear, particularly from Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe, that the situation remains grim and will become worse, there are no solutions on the table. The only pluses are generous assistance from India and engagement with the IMF. Most people will not buy JVP leader Anura Kumara Dissanayake’s claim that Wickremesinghe is exaggerating the economic crisis “to cover up his own failure.” Wickremesinghe did not come into office with a magic wand. He was invited to takeover when the Rajapaksas were at the end of their tether. Dissanayake is right to the extent that the PM’s statements may add to the queues on the fear of worse to come.
Also in Parliament on Thursday, Wimal Weerawansa said that the events of May 9 were only a rehearsal of what will follow. Next time it will not only be the property and businesses of politicians that will be attacked. The whole affluent class is at risk, he darkly predicted. If hunger – or worse famine – hits, that is more probable than possible. He further asked what would happen if we are unable to feed our security forces. But as regular columnist Rajan Philips says on this page, the country picture appears very much to be “business as usual.” Unfortunately nobody asked Basil Rajapaksa whether he has plans to renounce his U.S. citizenship. It was as clear as daylight when the 20th Amendment was enacted, that the clause enabling dual citizen to hold public office was intended for Basil’s return to Parliament where he succeeded brother Mahinda as finance minister. Admitting that the Rajapaksas were better at politics than at government, BR answered in the affirmative when asked whether he’d be visiting the U.S. saying his family, including a grandson, were in that country.
Granting that the president is serious about an All Party government to tide over the crisis, why did the government elect its own nominee to chair the Public Finance Committee when the SJB wanted Dr. Harsha de Silva, who’s ability to do the job is unquestionable, to be given the job. If the SJB is ironclad on its decision to stay out of the government unless there’s a definite timeline set for GR’s departure, at least competent opposition politicians could be appointed to parliamentary watchdog committees where they can make useful contributions. Fending accusations of “underhand” tactics to have a government parliamentarian elected to chair the committee, Speaker Abeywardene said that the matter could be raised by the party leaders and a replacement agreed upon. It remains to be seen whether the SLPP will relent and permit an opposition nominee to serve as committee chair. The prime minister who owes his position to the SLPP is said to have preferred an opposition chair. But what influence does he have over the MPs who enthroned him? The recent election of the deputy speaker is sorry evidence of the papadam is crumbling.
At Basil Rajapaksa’s farewell press conference, the question on whether business tycoon Dhammika Perera would take his National List vacancy was fired. Rumours to this effect were swirling and a report that Perera had obtained SLPP membership remained uncontradicted. BR didn’t say ‘yes’ or ‘no’ but looked at SLPP General Secretary Sagara Kariyawasam flanking him and said it was a matter for the party. Readers may remember that Mahinda Rajapaksa appointed Dhammika Perera Secretary to the Transport Ministry some years ago. He didn’t make any waves in that job and eased out of the position seemingly on his own volition. But he’s gone public with the opinion that much can be done from seat of the Secretary Finance implying that’s a job he’d like to take. Obviously finance minister would be even better.
The country will soon know what’s in store through the forthcoming constitutional amendment. Though Justice Minister Wijeyadasa Rajapakshe calls it 21A, the TNA’s M.A. Sumanthiran says ‘No.’ 21A is what the SJB has already tabled in the House. As he said in a well received parliamentary speech we run today, ours now is a peculiar Parliament with big chunks of the government sitting as “Independents” in the opposition. These MPs are neither fish, flesh or fowl and acting on their own personal agendas. The prospects of any solution to the horrific crisis gripping the nation being delivered by the incumbent Parliament seems remote and an election far off. This, after all, is a land like no other where a prime minister who resigned attends cabinet meetings. And a minister sentenced to jail by a competent court continues to sit in the cabinet.
Saturday 8th June, 2024
It was with shock and dismay that we received the news about death threats to COPF (Committee on Public Finance) Chairman Dr. Harsha de Silva over the ongoing parliamentary probe into the on-arrival visa scam. Dr. de Silva yesterday told Speaker Mahinda Yapa Abeywardena, in Parliament, that he was facing death threats and intimidation, and it was incumbent upon Parliament to ensure his safety. He stopped short of naming names, but revealed that some ruling party MPs were among those who had ganged up against him. The Speaker only said there had been no complaint, and he would look into the matter.
The SLPP-UNP government has been doing everything in its power to have all parliamentary committees under its thumb. The COPE (Committee on Public Enterprises), which once helped restore public faith in the legislature by exposing state sector corruption, has now become a mere appendage of the incumbent regime, thanks to the appointment of SLPP MP Rohitha Abeygunawardena as its Chairman. The SLPP-UNP combine also tried to oust COPF Chairman Dr. de Silva, but in vain. However, it knows more than one way to shoe a horse.
The COPF, under Dr. de Silva’s chairmanship, has been a thorn in the side of the government, which is struggling to cover up numerous corrupt deals. Dr. de Silva yesterday told Parliament that he found it extremely difficult to function as the COPF head due to severe resource constraints his committee was facing; he himself had to pay the salaries of some of his staff members besides burning the midnight oil.
The sheer workload he had to cope with as the COPF chief had taken its toll on his health, he said, informing the Speaker that he was at the end of his tether, and at times thought of resigning from the COPF. This is exactly what the government wants him to do; resource squeezes and threats are aimed at making him quit.
On 26 May, Dr. de Silva revealed, in an ‘X’ post, that the COPF had uncovered some vital information about the visa scam and it would reveal everything after its final meeting on the issue; the COPF was committed to exposing the truth behind the controversial tender, he added. In an editorial comment on 27 May, we warned him.
While thanking him for his bold stand, we pointed out that by making such a statement, he had thrown caution to the wind, and become a marked target, with the government making an all-out effort to delay the COPF investigation lest the truth should come out much to the detriment of its interests in this election year. Unfortunately, what was feared has come about; Dr. de Silva is complaining of death threats and government moves to strangulate the COPF financially to derail its investigations.
Dr. de Silva’s predicament exemplifies the fate that befalls the few good men and women in Parliament. It is hoped that all those who seek an end to the state sector corruption will rally behind Dr. de Silva, and bring pressure to bear on the government to ensure his safety. Let Dr. de Silva be urged to reveal the names of those who have issued threats, veiled or otherwise, to him and are trying to scuttle the COPF probes.
Friday 7th June, 2024
The SLPP-UNP government is going hell for leather to make bad laws as if there were no tomorrow. It is abusing its parliamentary majority, which has been retained with the help of some crossovers, for that purpose. The Opposition, the media and trade unions are up in arms, and understandably so. The incumbent regime is a dead man walking; it is so desperate that it is capable of anything. Hence the need for it to be restrained.
The Electricity (Amendment) Bill (EAB) plunged Parliament into turmoil yesterday, but the government secured its passage. The Supreme Court (SC) determined the entire EAB inconsistent with the Constitution and recommended changes thereto. After unveiling the Bill, sometime ago, Minister of Power and Energy Kanchana Wijesekera hailed it as an excellent piece of legislation aimed at straightening up the power sector to serve the public interest better.
The SC determination left him with egg on his face. He reminded us of the proverbial curate who, while eating a stale egg, assured his host, a Bishop, that parts of it were excellent. Wijesekera’s egg, as it were, made Parliament stink yesterday, but he sought to please his masters by praising it as a silver bullet.
EAB should have been discarded and a new one drafted in consultation with all stakeholders. But the government is apparently driven by an ulterior motive; its aim is not to serve Sri Lanka’s interests but to look after those of some moneybags.
It is not uncommon for Bills to contain some flaws, which are rectified either before or during the committee stage. But there is something terribly wrong with draft Bills that are full of sections inconsistent with the Constitution. The drafters of EAB have demonstrated their sheer ignorance of the supreme law, and that they are not equal to the task of drafting Bills. If they had read the Constitution at least perfunctorily, they would not have drafted such a bad law.
Ignorant and incompetent, they do not deserve to be paid with public funds and must be sent back to law school. They must be summoned before Parliament and questioned on their serious lapses, which have caused public faith in the national legislature to diminish.
Curiously, the MPs who demand that judges, doctors, Central Bankers, and other public officials be summoned before Parliament have taken badly drafted Bills for granted. The power sector trade unions yesterday alleged that EAB was of Indian origin and geared towards furthering the interests of Adani Group at the expense of Sri Lanka.
Most critics of EAB are agreeable in principle to the need for power sector reforms; the Ceylon Electricity Board should be given a radical shake-up, and transformed into a modern organisation capable of providing a better service at a lower cost. They only asked the government to tread cautiously, consulting all stakeholders and taking action to ensure that the country’s interests prevailed over everything else. But the government was in a mighty hurry to steamroller the Bill through Parliament, making the Opposition ask whether it was doing so at the behest of some external forces involved in controversial power generation deals here.
What is passed by the current Parliament can be either amended or abolished by a future parliament in a constitutionally prescribed manner. But that does not mean that a government is free to pass bad laws, making the country enter into long-term agreements with powerful nations and their investors. It looks as if the SLPP-UNP regime did not care two hoots about the consequences of its actions.
Thursday 6th June, 2024
The outcome of India’s parliamentary election (2024) has led to a ‘perspective ambiguity’. Prime Minister Narendra Modi lost no time in declaring victory for the BJP-led NDA alliance, which secured 293 seats in the 543-member Parliament, but he must be a worried man. The BJP is short of 32 seats to form a government under its own steam; it has lost 63 seats or about 20% of its parliamentary strength. It had 303 seats in the previous Parliament, and that number has dropped to 240.
Modi has become the second Indian Prime Minister to win a third term. The first PM to do so was Jawaharlal Nehru. But Nehru won an outright majority in Parliament in 1962; Modi has had to depend on smaller parties in his alliance to retain his hold on power. Modi must be reeling from a sharp drop in his victory margin in his own constituency, Varanasi; it has decreased to 152,000 from 480,000 in 2019 whereas Modi’s bete noire, Rahul Gandhi, won Raebareli by a staggering 390,000 votes.
Modi, who reigned supreme with 303 seats in the previous Parliament, is now dependent on parties such as Nitish Kumar’s JD-U and Chandrababu Naidu’s TDP to form a government. He has had to lead an alliance of strange bedfellows. Both Kumar and Naidu were bitter critics of Modi. Kumar helped form the oppositional alliance, the INDIA bloc, before switching his allegiance to PM Modi. Naidu also closed ranks with the BJP in the run-up to the election. These politicians have been described as extremely ambitious and highly unpredictable, and whether Modi will be able to manage them and consolidate his grip on the NDA alliance remains to be seen. They will demand plum ministerial posts in return for their support. The TDP is said to be eyeing Transport and Health portfolios! That is the name of the game in coalition politics, where it is not uncommon for the tail to wag the dog, so to speak. These two political leaders are however not the only problem Modi will have to contend with. The next five years will feel like an eternity for PM Modi.
Nothing would have been more shocking for the BJP than its defeat in Uttar Pradesh’s Faizabad constituency, where the Ram Mandir has been built. Modi may have thought he would be able to win the Lok Sabha election hands down after the consecration of that temple, which became a centrepiece of the BJP’s election campaign. The BJP lost that seat to the Samajwadi Party! Modi must be disappointed that the Ram Mandir hype failed to trigger a massive wave of support for his party. This particular defeat signifies a massive setback for the BJP’s ethno-religious agenda.
Modi’s divisive election campaign failed to yield the desired result. The BJP’s failure to secure an outright majority could be attributed to a host of factors, some of them being the suppression of the Opposition, the arrogance of power, chronic unemployment, and the rising cost of living. The BJP also did not care to reimage itself in a positive light to attract the youth.
Modi will hereafter see the Congress-led INDIA bloc with 223 seats, in his rearview mirror. The Congress (99 seats) and its allies have eaten into the BJP support base considerably, but they have a long way to go before being able to capture power.
The bumpy ride ahead for the BJP-led coalition government to be formed may improve the INDIA bloc’s chances of bettering their electoral performance and turning the tables on the BJP and its allies in time to come. Modi will have a lot to worry about in his third term.
US sports envoys to Lanka to champion youth development
Rahuman questions sudden cancellation of leave of CEB employees
