Features
THEY MADE HISTORY 30 YEARS AGO
by ECB Wijeyesinghe
Exactly 30 years ago (Jan. 1950) an epoch-making conference was held in Colombo when seven Commonwealth Foreign Ministers met in the old Senate building opposite the Gordon Gardens and discussed their mutual problems.
Never before had any city in Asia been host to a Commonwealth meeting on foreign affairs, and to some of us who had the privilege of playing even a minor role, it was a most rewarding experience. Mr. D. S. Senanayake, then Prime Minister of Ceylon, and one of the world’s most highly respected statesmen, presided over the deliberations. He handled the meeting like an old Roman charioteer entrusted with a team of seven stallions each with idiosyncrasies and temperaments of their own.
Sir Percy Spender of Australia who, with our own President Jayewardene, played a historic role in the formulation of the Colombo Plan, has set down in his entertaining book “Exercises in Diplomacy,” the story of the conference and the important role that the Ceylon delegation played in it. In this volume it is interesting to see ourselves as others see us especially when compliments are laid on with a trowel.
For example, Mr. D. S. Senanayake who had a stiff six-day session as President is described as a wise and friendly man. Whenever the argument got a little torrid, sometimes owing to the tropical heat, he would calm the delegates with a smile by saying quietly “I think we will now have a cup of tea”. The tea break was a panacea that never failed to ease the tension.
Panacea
The Ceylon delegation which included Mr. J. R. Jayewardene, then Minister of Finance, was headed by Senator (later Sir) Lalita Rajapakse, K.C. who was the Minister of Justice. Always spruce and elegantly dressed, Sir Lalita made a big hit with the English speaking delegates. Spender calls Rajapakse “an able and delightful man whose eloquence was matched only by his faultless English diction.” That, he adds, was a matter of surprise to at least one member of the Australian delegation who could not reconcile himself to the idea that an Asian could excel him in his own language.
Mr. J. R. Jayewardene although he participated rarely in the heated conference discussions played a very important role for Ceylon, dealing with economic and financial problems. Spender remembers him as a man of reserved and serious mien who was most co-operative. As a matter of fact the two of them put their heads together and conceived the Colombo Plan at this conference. The baby was born nine months later, but it did not make its presence felt till July 1951.
Apart from his valuable work as a financial expert the future President of Sri Lanka manifested at the conference the other side of his good nature – his hospitality. It is worth recalling that Spender, in his book, has set it down that Mr. Jayewardene was “a splendidly extravagant host, who gave the joint delegations one of the most sparkling and exotic receptions I have attended anywhere in the world”.
Side by side with Ceylon’s youthful JRJ. and Lalita bursting with energy, the British delegates, Ernest Bevin and Philip Noel-Baker, appeared to be statesmen doing their last lap. Bevin, who was billeted at Temple Trees was a heavily-built man, full of homely humour. He had risen to Cabinet rank from the bottom of the Trade Union ladder and had a wide knowledge of men and affairs.
But unfortunately he was in failing health and had a physical disability. The heat and humidity in Colombo added to his woes which he bore with remarkable courage. But Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru, immaculately dressed in his Sherwani and Gandhi cap, looked the picture of fitness. Slim and handsome, with a rose-bud in his button-hole he walked briskly from Queen’s House, where he was staying, to the conference. When Nehru reached the entrance to the Senate building he would put on a burst of speed and run up the stairs to the obvious annoyance of his heavy-footed colleagues.
For six days Nehru was the centre of attraction in Colombo. He loved to emerge from the Queen’s House gates and salute the thousands who gathered daily on the pavement of the GPO. The crowd consisting mostly of persons of Indian origin, cheered him to the echo until he ran into the recesses of the conference room.This was a daily ritual. There were some delegates, including Spender, who thought that Nehru’s sprint was a small but forgivable exercise in vanity. Another man who caught the fancy of the crowd was Nehru’s principal adviser, Krishna Menon. Gaunt and looking like an ascetic, he was one of Kerala’s brilliant sons at a time when some people believed that India was suffering from “Menongitis”.
Krishna Menon, in 1950, was the Indian High Commissioner in the United Kingdom, and many a British politician had had a taste of his testy humour. His subtle mind evolved solutions for the most complicated problems. Both the solutions and the problems baffled a plain, blunt man like D. S. Senanayake.
For the record it may be mentioned that the scholarly Lester Pearson led the Canadian team, while Sir Fredrick Doidge and Paul Sauer were the respective skippers of the New Zealand and South African delegations. One of the most important features of this 1950 conference in Colombo was that it served as a springboard for so many of the participants to attain higher things.
While the names of Spender and Jayewardene were engraved for all time on the foundation stone of the Colombo Plan, Gulam Mohammed of Pakistan was shortly afterwards elevated to the Governor-Generalship of this country. Lester Pearson became the Prime Minister of Canada and also won the Nobel Peace Prize along with Philip Noel-Baker.
Of the lesser mortals who, nevertheless were vital cogs in the conference machinery, there was Kanthiah Vaithianathan, one of the secretaries, who was knighted even before the ink was dry on the official report. Rajendra Coomaraswamy, affectionately known as Roving Raju, who did much of the spade work on the Ceylon side to get the Colombo Plan baby into shape, was chosen as the First President of the Plan’s Council for Technical Co-operation. Later he went a few more steps up the ladder when he assumed the direction of the UNDP’s Regional Bureau for Asia. He has been going up ever since. Raju is now holding a high executive post in the FTZ.
Baptism
Herbert Hulugalle had his baptism of fire at this conference as the Director of the newly-formed Information Department. His efficiency and loyalty were duly rewarded by being sent out as our Ambassador to savour the delights of the glory that was Greece and the grandeur that was Rome. One of Hulugalle’s most enthusiastic assistants, was a bright young Lake House journalist named L. P. Goonetilleke who eventually joined the Colombo Plan Bureau and rose to be its Principal Information Officer.
“L.P.” was responsible for organizing numerous spectacular exhibitions and publishing several artistic brochures and magazines dealing with the achievements of the Colombo Plan. For about 20 years, until his recent death, “LP” was the live-wire of the bureau. He was a good advertisement not only for the Colombo Plan but for Ceylon Journalism.
Two young people who lent glamour to the 1950 conference were the sprightly pair of girls that adorned the Reception Desk, where elderly delegates lingered longer than was absolutely necessary. The receptionists were Babsy Seneviratne and Erin Subasinghe, both of whom worked under the wing of the amiable Information chief – Hulugalle. Babsy was considered by the Italian Director Petroni, head of the Government Film unit, to be one of the most beautiful women he had seen.
Later she went to Italy where she met an Indian millionaire and married him. Erin Subasinghe had a charm of a quieter quality. When R. G. (Dickie) Senanayake met her in the Senate building it was a classic case of love at first sight. Needless to say she married the handsome, young Cabinet Minister and lived happily ever afterwards
(Excerpted from The Good At Their Best first published in 1980)
by Dr Gotabhya Ranasinghe
Senior Consultant Cardiologist
National Hospital Sri Lanka
When we sought a meeting with Hon Dr. Ramesh Pathirana, Minister of Health, he graciously cleared his busy schedule to accommodate us. Renowned for his attentive listening and deep understanding, Minister Pathirana is dedicated to advancing the health sector. His openness and transparency exemplify the qualities of an exemplary politician and minister.
Dr. Palitha Mahipala, the current Health Secretary, demonstrates both commendable enthusiasm and unwavering support. This combination of attributes makes him a highly compatible colleague for the esteemed Minister of Health.
Our discussion centered on a project that has been in the works for the past 30 years, one that no other minister had managed to advance.
Minister Pathirana, however, recognized the project’s significance and its potential to revolutionize care for heart patients.
The project involves the construction of a state-of-the-art facility at the premises of the National Hospital Colombo. The project’s location within the premises of the National Hospital underscores its importance and relevance to the healthcare infrastructure of the nation.
This facility will include a cardiology building and a tertiary care center, equipped with the latest technology to handle and treat all types of heart-related conditions and surgeries.
Securing funding was a major milestone for this initiative. Minister Pathirana successfully obtained approval for a $40 billion loan from the Asian Development Bank. With the funding in place, the foundation stone is scheduled to be laid in September this year, and construction will begin in January 2025.
This project guarantees a consistent and uninterrupted supply of stents and related medications for heart patients. As a result, patients will have timely access to essential medical supplies during their treatment and recovery. By securing these critical resources, the project aims to enhance patient outcomes, minimize treatment delays, and maintain the highest standards of cardiac care.
Upon its fruition, this monumental building will serve as a beacon of hope and healing, symbolizing the unwavering dedication to improving patient outcomes and fostering a healthier society.We anticipate a future marked by significant progress and positive outcomes in Sri Lanka’s cardiovascular treatment landscape within the foreseeable timeframe.
by Fr. Emmanuel Fernando, OMI
Jesuit Fr. Aloysius Pieris (affectionately called Fr. Aloy) celebrated his 90th birthday on April 9, 2024 and I, as the editor of our Oblate Journal, THE MISSIONARY OBLATE had gone to press by that time. Immediately I decided to publish an article, appreciating the untiring selfless services he continues to offer for inter-Faith dialogue, the renewal of the Catholic Church, his concern for the poor and the suffering Sri Lankan masses and to me, the present writer.
It was in 1988, when I was appointed Director of the Oblate Scholastics at Ampitiya by the then Oblate Provincial Fr. Anselm Silva, that I came to know Fr. Aloy more closely. Knowing well his expertise in matters spiritual, theological, Indological and pastoral, and with the collaborative spirit of my companion-formators, our Oblate Scholastics were sent to Tulana, the Research and Encounter Centre, Kelaniya, of which he is the Founder-Director, for ‘exposure-programmes’ on matters spiritual, biblical, theological and pastoral. Some of these dimensions according to my view and that of my companion-formators, were not available at the National Seminary, Ampitiya.
Ever since that time, our Oblate formators/ accompaniers at the Oblate Scholasticate, Ampitiya , have continued to send our Oblate Scholastics to Tulana Centre for deepening their insights and convictions regarding matters needed to serve the people in today’s context. Fr. Aloy also had tried very enthusiastically with the Oblate team headed by Frs. Oswald Firth and Clement Waidyasekara to begin a Theologate, directed by the Religious Congregations in Sri Lanka, for the contextual formation/ accompaniment of their members. It should very well be a desired goal of the Leaders / Provincials of the Religious Congregations.
Besides being a formator/accompanier at the Oblate Scholasticate, I was entrusted also with the task of editing and publishing our Oblate journal, ‘The Missionary Oblate’. To maintain the quality of the journal I continue to depend on Fr. Aloy for his thought-provoking and stimulating articles on Biblical Spirituality, Biblical Theology and Ecclesiology. I am very grateful to him for his generous assistance. Of late, his writings on renewal of the Church, initiated by Pope St. John XX111 and continued by Pope Francis through the Synodal path, published in our Oblate journal, enable our readers to focus their attention also on the needed renewal in the Catholic Church in Sri Lanka. Fr. Aloy appreciated very much the Synodal path adopted by the Jesuit Pope Francis for the renewal of the Church, rooted very much on prayerful discernment. In my Religious and presbyteral life, Fr.Aloy continues to be my spiritual animator / guide and ongoing formator / acccompanier.
Fr. Aloysius Pieris, BA Hons (Lond), LPh (SHC, India), STL (PFT, Naples), PhD (SLU/VC), ThD (Tilburg), D.Ltt (KU), has been one of the eminent Asian theologians well recognized internationally and one who has lectured and held visiting chairs in many universities both in the West and in the East. Many members of Religious Congregations from Asian countries have benefited from his lectures and guidance in the East Asian Pastoral Institute (EAPI) in Manila, Philippines. He had been a Theologian consulted by the Federation of Asian Bishops’ Conferences for many years. During his professorship at the Gregorian University in Rome, he was called to be a member of a special group of advisers on other religions consulted by Pope Paul VI.
Fr. Aloy is the author of more than 30 books and well over 500 Research Papers. Some of his books and articles have been translated and published in several countries. Among those books, one can find the following: 1) The Genesis of an Asian Theology of Liberation (An Autobiographical Excursus on the Art of Theologising in Asia, 2) An Asian Theology of Liberation, 3) Providential Timeliness of Vatican 11 (a long-overdue halt to a scandalous millennium, 4) Give Vatican 11 a chance, 5) Leadership in the Church, 6) Relishing our faith in working for justice (Themes for study and discussion), 7) A Message meant mainly, not exclusively for Jesuits (Background information necessary for helping Francis renew the Church), 8) Lent in Lanka (Reflections and Resolutions, 9) Love meets wisdom (A Christian Experience of Buddhism, 10) Fire and Water 11) God’s Reign for God’s poor, 12) Our Unhiddden Agenda (How we Jesuits work, pray and form our men). He is also the Editor of two journals, Vagdevi, Journal of Religious Reflection and Dialogue, New Series.
Fr. Aloy has a BA in Pali and Sanskrit from the University of London and a Ph.D in Buddhist Philosophy from the University of Sri Lankan, Vidyodaya Campus. On Nov. 23, 2019, he was awarded the prestigious honorary Doctorate of Literature (D.Litt) by the Chancellor of the University of Kelaniya, the Most Venerable Welamitiyawe Dharmakirthi Sri Kusala Dhamma Thera.
Fr. Aloy continues to be a promoter of Gospel values and virtues. Justice as a constitutive dimension of love and social concern for the downtrodden masses are very much noted in his life and work. He had very much appreciated the commitment of the late Fr. Joseph (Joe) Fernando, the National Director of the Social and Economic Centre (SEDEC) for the poor.
In Sri Lanka, a few religious Congregations – the Good Shepherd Sisters, the Christian Brothers, the Marist Brothers and the Oblates – have invited him to animate their members especially during their Provincial Congresses, Chapters and International Conferences. The mainline Christian Churches also have sought his advice and followed his seminars. I, for one, regret very much, that the Sri Lankan authorities of the Catholic Church –today’s Hierarchy—- have not sought Fr.
Aloy’s expertise for the renewal of the Catholic Church in Sri Lanka and thus have not benefited from the immense store of wisdom and insight that he can offer to our local Church while the Sri Lankan bishops who governed the Catholic church in the immediate aftermath of the Second Vatican Council (Edmund Fernando OMI, Anthony de Saram, Leo Nanayakkara OSB, Frank Marcus Fernando, Paul Perera,) visited him and consulted him on many matters. Among the Tamil Bishops, Bishop Rayappu Joseph was keeping close contact with him and Bishop J. Deogupillai hosted him and his team visiting him after the horrible Black July massacre of Tamils.
Sri Lanka-Singapore Free Trade Agreement
By Gomi Senadhira
senadhiragomi@gmail.com
“You might tell fairy tales, but the progress of a country cannot be achieved through such narratives. A country cannot be developed by making false promises. The country moved backward because of the electoral promises made by political parties throughout time. We have witnessed that the ultimate result of this is the country becoming bankrupt. Unfortunately, many segments of the population have not come to realize this yet.” – President Ranil Wickremesinghe, 2024 Budget speech
Any Sri Lankan would agree with the above words of President Wickremesinghe on the false promises our politicians and officials make and the fairy tales they narrate which bankrupted this country. So, to understand this, let’s look at one such fairy tale with lots of false promises; Ranil Wickremesinghe’s greatest achievement in the area of international trade and investment promotion during the Yahapalana period, Sri Lanka-Singapore Free Trade Agreement (SLSFTA).
It is appropriate and timely to do it now as Finance Minister Wickremesinghe has just presented to parliament a bill on the National Policy on Economic Transformation which includes the establishment of an Office for International Trade and the Sri Lanka Institute of Economics and International Trade.
Was SLSFTA a “Cleverly negotiated Free Trade Agreement” as stated by the (former) Minister of Development Strategies and International Trade Malik Samarawickrama during the Parliamentary Debate on the SLSFTA in July 2018, or a colossal blunder covered up with lies, false promises, and fairy tales? After SLSFTA was signed there were a number of fairy tales published on this agreement by the Ministry of Development Strategies and International, Institute of Policy Studies, and others.
However, for this article, I would like to limit my comments to the speech by Minister Samarawickrama during the Parliamentary Debate, and the two most important areas in the agreement which were covered up with lies, fairy tales, and false promises, namely: revenue loss for Sri Lanka and Investment from Singapore. On the other important area, “Waste products dumping” I do not want to comment here as I have written extensively on the issue.
1. The revenue loss
During the Parliamentary Debate in July 2018, Minister Samarawickrama stated “…. let me reiterate that this FTA with Singapore has been very cleverly negotiated by us…. The liberalisation programme under this FTA has been carefully designed to have the least impact on domestic industry and revenue collection. We have included all revenue sensitive items in the negative list of items which will not be subject to removal of tariff. Therefore, 97.8% revenue from Customs duty is protected. Our tariff liberalisation will take place over a period of 12-15 years! In fact, the revenue earned through tariffs on goods imported from Singapore last year was Rs. 35 billion.
The revenue loss for over the next 15 years due to the FTA is only Rs. 733 million– which when annualised, on average, is just Rs. 51 million. That is just 0.14% per year! So anyone who claims the Singapore FTA causes revenue loss to the Government cannot do basic arithmetic! Mr. Speaker, in conclusion, I call on my fellow members of this House – don’t mislead the public with baseless criticism that is not grounded in facts. Don’t look at petty politics and use these issues for your own political survival.”
I was surprised to read the minister’s speech because an article published in January 2018 in “The Straits Times“, based on information released by the Singaporean Negotiators stated, “…. With the FTA, tariff savings for Singapore exports are estimated to hit $10 million annually“.
As the annual tariff savings (that is the revenue loss for Sri Lanka) calculated by the Singaporean Negotiators, Singaporean $ 10 million (Sri Lankan rupees 1,200 million in 2018) was way above the rupees’ 733 million revenue loss for 15 years estimated by the Sri Lankan negotiators, it was clear to any observer that one of the parties to the agreement had not done the basic arithmetic!
Six years later, according to a report published by “The Morning” newspaper, speaking at the Committee on Public Finance (COPF) on 7th May 2024, Mr Samarawickrama’s chief trade negotiator K.J. Weerasinghehad had admitted “…. that forecasted revenue loss for the Government of Sri Lanka through the Singapore FTA is Rs. 450 million in 2023 and Rs. 1.3 billion in 2024.”
If these numbers are correct, as tariff liberalisation under the SLSFTA has just started, we will pass Rs 2 billion very soon. Then, the question is how Sri Lanka’s trade negotiators made such a colossal blunder. Didn’t they do their basic arithmetic? If they didn’t know how to do basic arithmetic they should have at least done their basic readings. For example, the headline of the article published in The Straits Times in January 2018 was “Singapore, Sri Lanka sign FTA, annual savings of $10m expected”.
Anyway, as Sri Lanka’s chief negotiator reiterated at the COPF meeting that “…. since 99% of the tariffs in Singapore have zero rates of duty, Sri Lanka has agreed on 80% tariff liberalisation over a period of 15 years while expecting Singapore investments to address the imbalance in trade,” let’s turn towards investment.
Investment from Singapore
In July 2018, speaking during the Parliamentary Debate on the FTA this is what Minister Malik Samarawickrama stated on investment from Singapore, “Already, thanks to this FTA, in just the past two-and-a-half months since the agreement came into effect we have received a proposal from Singapore for investment amounting to $ 14.8 billion in an oil refinery for export of petroleum products. In addition, we have proposals for a steel manufacturing plant for exports ($ 1 billion investment), flour milling plant ($ 50 million), sugar refinery ($ 200 million). This adds up to more than $ 16.05 billion in the pipeline on these projects alone.
And all of these projects will create thousands of more jobs for our people. In principle approval has already been granted by the BOI and the investors are awaiting the release of land the environmental approvals to commence the project.
I request the Opposition and those with vested interests to change their narrow-minded thinking and join us to develop our country. We must always look at what is best for the whole community, not just the few who may oppose. We owe it to our people to courageously take decisions that will change their lives for the better.”
According to the media report I quoted earlier, speaking at the Committee on Public Finance (COPF) Chief Negotiator Weerasinghe has admitted that Sri Lanka was not happy with overall Singapore investments that have come in the past few years in return for the trade liberalisation under the Singapore-Sri Lanka Free Trade Agreement. He has added that between 2021 and 2023 the total investment from Singapore had been around $162 million!
What happened to those projects worth $16 billion negotiated, thanks to the SLSFTA, in just the two-and-a-half months after the agreement came into effect and approved by the BOI? I do not know about the steel manufacturing plant for exports ($ 1 billion investment), flour milling plant ($ 50 million) and sugar refinery ($ 200 million).
However, story of the multibillion-dollar investment in the Petroleum Refinery unfolded in a manner that would qualify it as the best fairy tale with false promises presented by our politicians and the officials, prior to 2019 elections.
Though many Sri Lankans got to know, through the media which repeatedly highlighted a plethora of issues surrounding the project and the questionable credentials of the Singaporean investor, the construction work on the Mirrijiwela Oil Refinery along with the cement factory began on the24th of March 2019 with a bang and Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe and his ministers along with the foreign and local dignitaries laid the foundation stones.
That was few months before the 2019 Presidential elections. Inaugurating the construction work Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe said the projects will create thousands of job opportunities in the area and surrounding districts.
The oil refinery, which was to be built over 200 acres of land, with the capacity to refine 200,000 barrels of crude oil per day, was to generate US$7 billion of exports and create 1,500 direct and 3,000 indirect jobs. The construction of the refinery was to be completed in 44 months. Four years later, in August 2023 the Cabinet of Ministers approved the proposal presented by President Ranil Wickremesinghe to cancel the agreement with the investors of the refinery as the project has not been implemented! Can they explain to the country how much money was wasted to produce that fairy tale?
It is obvious that the President, ministers, and officials had made huge blunders and had deliberately misled the public and the parliament on the revenue loss and potential investment from SLSFTA with fairy tales and false promises.
As the president himself said, a country cannot be developed by making false promises or with fairy tales and these false promises and fairy tales had bankrupted the country. “Unfortunately, many segments of the population have not come to realize this yet”.
(The writer, a specialist and an activist on trade and development issues . )
US sports envoys to Lanka to champion youth development
Rahuman questions sudden cancellation of leave of CEB employees
