Connect with us

Features

SRI LANKA SHRIEKED WHEN D.S. FELL

Published

on

by ECB Wijeyasinghe

Schoolboys at the bottom of the class, wherever they May be, can take heart from at least one dominating figure in Ceylon history. In his youth he preferred playing with a bat and ball to poring over boring text-books. In course of time, by sheer industry and integrity, the last lad in the form lived to become the first in the hearts of his countrymen.

That miracle was performed by Don Stephen Senanayake whose life in some ways resembled that of another colossus of this century, Winston Churchill. The famous British Prime Minister spent three years in the second form at Harrow, the celebrated British public school. When he was riled about it, Churchill hit back by saying that he knew three times as much as his classmates knew, and he probably did.

Possibly the same thing happened at S. Thomas’ College in Mutwal where Don Stephen cheerfully carried the wooden spoon from one classroom to another. Some of his friends, with some pretensions to literacy, said that the initials “D.S.” stood for Duns Scotus, adding that the derogatory headgear, the Dunce Cap, was made to fit his head. Actually, as a matter of fact, as D. S. would have said, Duns Scotus was one of the most influential mediaeval scholars. He was a friar and a teacher at Oxford and later in Paris. Owing to his skill in controversy, especially against the metaphysics of St. Thomas Aquinas, his contemporaries gave him the title of Doctor Subtilis. It also earned for him the enmity of the ancient Thomists, who must not be confused with modern Thomians.

TRAGEDY

All this preamble leads us to the anniversary of the day that Sri Lanka shrieked when Senanayake fell. It may be useful to recall the background to that tragic event. He was then the Prime Minister, the first in independent Ceylon and D. S. Senanayake was taking his usual morning ride on the Galle Face Green.

It happened on Friday, March 21, 1952, and keeping the P.M. company were Sir Richard Aluvihare, the IGP. and G. G. Ponnambalam, one of his Cabinet Ministers. They were all good riders and after a preliminary canter, the horses broke into a gallop, keeping almost abreast of each other but with the P.M.’s going strongly ahead. To the utter consternation of his companions on the Green, Senanayake fell off the saddle and somersaulted twice before he alighted on his side.

He was unconscious and bleeding from the nose when he was rushed to a nursing home. The general belief was that he was the victim of a stroke of paralysis. Dr. M. V. P. Peiris, one of Ceylon’s most brilliant surgeons, attended on him assisted by Dr. R. MacCharles, Professor of Surgery of Manitoba University, who happened to be in the Island at the time.

Wireless messages were immediately flashed as the Ceylon doctors wished to have the opinion of the world’s greatest neuro-surgeon, Sir Hugh Cairns, the Nuffield Professor of Surgery at Oxford University. Sir Hugh became famous during World War II for his delicate brain operations on wounded soldiers. He once saved the lives of Lawrence of Arabia and General George S. Patton.

It was at this point that the British Prime Minister Winston Churchill stepped in, and displayed not only his magnanimity, but the other virtues which made him win the war. Churchill gave the immediate order: “Spare nothing. Get a plane in the air at once to take Sir Hugh Cairns to Ceylon.” Within a few hours Sir Hugh, with two other doctors, including Walpole Lewin, and two nurses were ready to fly out. A speedy R. A. F. Hastings aircraft was on the runway. Two crews were ready to go aboard so that they could have alternate spells of rest and duty.

Just then a telephone message from Ceylon reached Sir Hugh that the P.M. was sinking and advising the flight to be called off. Meanwhile Dr. Jacob Chandy of Vellore and Dr. D. Jooma of Karachi, two of the leading neuro-surgeons of India and Pakistan, had arrived, but it was too late. D. S. Senanayake died on March 22, 1952 and everybody wept.

VISION

He was a man of vision and also a man of action who appeared to have “all the centuries in him”. From the time he became Minister of Agriculture in 1931 until his death, he restored ancient tanks, built new ones, refashioned rural Ceylon so much that many people thought that Parakrama Bahu the Great, who reigned in the twelfth century, had come to life once more.

Today, thanks to D. S. Senanayake, we have Minneriya and Hingurakgoda, the Parakrama Samudra, Minipe, Gal Oya and a number of other giant projects which have provided thousands and thousands of men and women with food and employment.

Senanayake was also a man without any religious or communal prejudices. Two Tamils on whom he leaned heavily were C. Suntheralingam and Sir Kanthiah Vaithianathan, both devout Hindus. Another good friend was T. B. Jayah, the great Malay educationist. Earlier in life he always sought the advice of two eminent Roman Catholics, E. J. Samerawickreme, K. C. and Albert A. Wickremesinghe, the redoubtable Kegalle lawyer, whose work in connection with the Shooting Commission after the 1915 riots, fired Senanayake’s spark of patriotism.

Dr. M. C. M. Kaleel, the President of the Ceylon Muslim League, at the time of Senanayake’s death called him “Ceylon’s greatest son, because he welded the elements in the country into one united whole”.

LINCOLN

That is why he has also been described as the “Abraham Lincoln of the East”. At a memorial service Warden R. S. de Saram emphasised the resemblance with the American patriot and dwelt on his homeliness, sincerity, simplicity and honesty of mind. There was not a dry eye in the congregation at the old school Chapel when Canon de Saram asked Thomians young and Thomians old always to remember, with thankfulness to God, the name of D. S. Senanayake. It was a touching tribute from a Christian prelate and principal to a Buddhist old boy.

Senanayake had an astonishing humility and was completely devoid of inhibitions. Once, during the short time I acted as Information Officer, in the absence of Herbert Hulugalle, he asked me to call at “Temple Trees” to give me some instructions. While he did so, he did a complete change of clothes from sarong and singlet to his workaday suit. One could not then help admiring the rippling muscles on his bare body. Though he was well past 66, the dreadful disease of diabetes had failed to make a dent on his magnificent physique.

Though writers of all countries and climes have paid high tributes to the wisdom and tolerance of Senanayake, it was the Ceylon journalist S. J. K. Crowther, his former school-mate, who summed up his character neatly in a few phrases. Crowther was a Tamil Christian but his admiration for Senanayake knew no bounds. He said the PM’s most admirable quality was his natural dignity. Senanayake refused to play down to the mob. If he wanted, he could have out-paced the tub-thumpers, but he would not cheapen himself. Without losing touch with the common man, he never made himself common.

Don Stephen Senanayake’s mortal remains were cremated on March 29, 1952, at Independence Square, almost at the very spot where he received the gift of freedom for his country. On that occasion it was a Burgher poet Hilaire D. Jansz, then Editor of the “Observer”, whose poignant lines most aptly expressed the sorrow of a bereaved nation with these words:

That mighty heart lay still, that mighty frame Asleep for ever, while the multitude Moved in a ceaseless stream of pious grief Amid the silent eloquence of flowers Today he will be borne through doleful streets Past those who throng to pay him reverence,Their guide, their guard, their father and their friend, And when he comes to his last journey’s end, Where sad mortality to ashes must Be burned by fires unrelenting, From Freedom’s consecrated ground will rise. The flaming beacon of his deathless name.

(Excerpted from The Good Among the Best first published in 1980)



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Features

The heart-friendly health minister

Published

on

Dr. Ramesh Pathirana

by Dr Gotabhya Ranasinghe
Senior Consultant Cardiologist
National Hospital Sri Lanka

When we sought a meeting with Hon Dr. Ramesh Pathirana, Minister of Health, he graciously cleared his busy schedule to accommodate us. Renowned for his attentive listening and deep understanding, Minister Pathirana is dedicated to advancing the health sector. His openness and transparency exemplify the qualities of an exemplary politician and minister.

Dr. Palitha Mahipala, the current Health Secretary, demonstrates both commendable enthusiasm and unwavering support. This combination of attributes makes him a highly compatible colleague for the esteemed Minister of Health.

Our discussion centered on a project that has been in the works for the past 30 years, one that no other minister had managed to advance.

Minister Pathirana, however, recognized the project’s significance and its potential to revolutionize care for heart patients.

The project involves the construction of a state-of-the-art facility at the premises of the National Hospital Colombo. The project’s location within the premises of the National Hospital underscores its importance and relevance to the healthcare infrastructure of the nation.

This facility will include a cardiology building and a tertiary care center, equipped with the latest technology to handle and treat all types of heart-related conditions and surgeries.

Securing funding was a major milestone for this initiative. Minister Pathirana successfully obtained approval for a $40 billion loan from the Asian Development Bank. With the funding in place, the foundation stone is scheduled to be laid in September this year, and construction will begin in January 2025.

This project guarantees a consistent and uninterrupted supply of stents and related medications for heart patients. As a result, patients will have timely access to essential medical supplies during their treatment and recovery. By securing these critical resources, the project aims to enhance patient outcomes, minimize treatment delays, and maintain the highest standards of cardiac care.

Upon its fruition, this monumental building will serve as a beacon of hope and healing, symbolizing the unwavering dedication to improving patient outcomes and fostering a healthier society.We anticipate a future marked by significant progress and positive outcomes in Sri Lanka’s cardiovascular treatment landscape within the foreseeable timeframe.

Continue Reading

Features

A LOVING TRIBUTE TO JESUIT FR. ALOYSIUS PIERIS ON HIS 90th BIRTHDAY

Published

on

Fr. Aloysius Pieris, SJ was awarded the prestigious honorary Doctorate of Literature (D.Litt) by the Chancellor of the University of Kelaniya, the Most Venerable Welamitiyawe Dharmakirthi Sri Kusala Dhamma Thera on Nov. 23, 2019.

by Fr. Emmanuel Fernando, OMI

Jesuit Fr. Aloysius Pieris (affectionately called Fr. Aloy) celebrated his 90th birthday on April 9, 2024 and I, as the editor of our Oblate Journal, THE MISSIONARY OBLATE had gone to press by that time. Immediately I decided to publish an article, appreciating the untiring selfless services he continues to offer for inter-Faith dialogue, the renewal of the Catholic Church, his concern for the poor and the suffering Sri Lankan masses and to me, the present writer.

It was in 1988, when I was appointed Director of the Oblate Scholastics at Ampitiya by the then Oblate Provincial Fr. Anselm Silva, that I came to know Fr. Aloy more closely. Knowing well his expertise in matters spiritual, theological, Indological and pastoral, and with the collaborative spirit of my companion-formators, our Oblate Scholastics were sent to Tulana, the Research and Encounter Centre, Kelaniya, of which he is the Founder-Director, for ‘exposure-programmes’ on matters spiritual, biblical, theological and pastoral. Some of these dimensions according to my view and that of my companion-formators, were not available at the National Seminary, Ampitiya.

Ever since that time, our Oblate formators/ accompaniers at the Oblate Scholasticate, Ampitiya , have continued to send our Oblate Scholastics to Tulana Centre for deepening their insights and convictions regarding matters needed to serve the people in today’s context. Fr. Aloy also had tried very enthusiastically with the Oblate team headed by Frs. Oswald Firth and Clement Waidyasekara to begin a Theologate, directed by the Religious Congregations in Sri Lanka, for the contextual formation/ accompaniment of their members. It should very well be a desired goal of the Leaders / Provincials of the Religious Congregations.

Besides being a formator/accompanier at the Oblate Scholasticate, I was entrusted also with the task of editing and publishing our Oblate journal, ‘The Missionary Oblate’. To maintain the quality of the journal I continue to depend on Fr. Aloy for his thought-provoking and stimulating articles on Biblical Spirituality, Biblical Theology and Ecclesiology. I am very grateful to him for his generous assistance. Of late, his writings on renewal of the Church, initiated by Pope St. John XX111 and continued by Pope Francis through the Synodal path, published in our Oblate journal, enable our readers to focus their attention also on the needed renewal in the Catholic Church in Sri Lanka. Fr. Aloy appreciated very much the Synodal path adopted by the Jesuit Pope Francis for the renewal of the Church, rooted very much on prayerful discernment. In my Religious and presbyteral life, Fr.Aloy continues to be my spiritual animator / guide and ongoing formator / acccompanier.

Fr. Aloysius Pieris, BA Hons (Lond), LPh (SHC, India), STL (PFT, Naples), PhD (SLU/VC), ThD (Tilburg), D.Ltt (KU), has been one of the eminent Asian theologians well recognized internationally and one who has lectured and held visiting chairs in many universities both in the West and in the East. Many members of Religious Congregations from Asian countries have benefited from his lectures and guidance in the East Asian Pastoral Institute (EAPI) in Manila, Philippines. He had been a Theologian consulted by the Federation of Asian Bishops’ Conferences for many years. During his professorship at the Gregorian University in Rome, he was called to be a member of a special group of advisers on other religions consulted by Pope Paul VI.

Fr. Aloy is the author of more than 30 books and well over 500 Research Papers. Some of his books and articles have been translated and published in several countries. Among those books, one can find the following: 1) The Genesis of an Asian Theology of Liberation (An Autobiographical Excursus on the Art of Theologising in Asia, 2) An Asian Theology of Liberation, 3) Providential Timeliness of Vatican 11 (a long-overdue halt to a scandalous millennium, 4) Give Vatican 11 a chance, 5) Leadership in the Church, 6) Relishing our faith in working for justice (Themes for study and discussion), 7) A Message meant mainly, not exclusively for Jesuits (Background information necessary for helping Francis renew the Church), 8) Lent in Lanka (Reflections and Resolutions, 9) Love meets wisdom (A Christian Experience of Buddhism, 10) Fire and Water 11) God’s Reign for God’s poor, 12) Our Unhiddden Agenda (How we Jesuits work, pray and form our men). He is also the Editor of two journals, Vagdevi, Journal of Religious Reflection and Dialogue, New Series.

Fr. Aloy has a BA in Pali and Sanskrit from the University of London and a Ph.D in Buddhist Philosophy from the University of Sri Lankan, Vidyodaya Campus. On Nov. 23, 2019, he was awarded the prestigious honorary Doctorate of Literature (D.Litt) by the Chancellor of the University of Kelaniya, the Most Venerable Welamitiyawe Dharmakirthi Sri Kusala Dhamma Thera.

Fr. Aloy continues to be a promoter of Gospel values and virtues. Justice as a constitutive dimension of love and social concern for the downtrodden masses are very much noted in his life and work. He had very much appreciated the commitment of the late Fr. Joseph (Joe) Fernando, the National Director of the Social and Economic Centre (SEDEC) for the poor.

In Sri Lanka, a few religious Congregations – the Good Shepherd Sisters, the Christian Brothers, the Marist Brothers and the Oblates – have invited him to animate their members especially during their Provincial Congresses, Chapters and International Conferences. The mainline Christian Churches also have sought his advice and followed his seminars. I, for one, regret very much, that the Sri Lankan authorities of the Catholic Church –today’s Hierarchy—- have not sought Fr.

Aloy’s expertise for the renewal of the Catholic Church in Sri Lanka and thus have not benefited from the immense store of wisdom and insight that he can offer to our local Church while the Sri Lankan bishops who governed the Catholic church in the immediate aftermath of the Second Vatican Council (Edmund Fernando OMI, Anthony de Saram, Leo Nanayakkara OSB, Frank Marcus Fernando, Paul Perera,) visited him and consulted him on many matters. Among the Tamil Bishops, Bishop Rayappu Joseph was keeping close contact with him and Bishop J. Deogupillai hosted him and his team visiting him after the horrible Black July massacre of Tamils.

Continue Reading

Features

A fairy tale, success or debacle

Published

on

Ministers S. Iswaran and Malik Samarawickrama signing the joint statement to launch FTA negotiations. (Picture courtesy IPS)

Sri Lanka-Singapore Free Trade Agreement

By Gomi Senadhira
senadhiragomi@gmail.com

“You might tell fairy tales, but the progress of a country cannot be achieved through such narratives. A country cannot be developed by making false promises. The country moved backward because of the electoral promises made by political parties throughout time. We have witnessed that the ultimate result of this is the country becoming bankrupt. Unfortunately, many segments of the population have not come to realize this yet.” – President Ranil Wickremesinghe, 2024 Budget speech

Any Sri Lankan would agree with the above words of President Wickremesinghe on the false promises our politicians and officials make and the fairy tales they narrate which bankrupted this country. So, to understand this, let’s look at one such fairy tale with lots of false promises; Ranil Wickremesinghe’s greatest achievement in the area of international trade and investment promotion during the Yahapalana period, Sri Lanka-Singapore Free Trade Agreement (SLSFTA).

It is appropriate and timely to do it now as Finance Minister Wickremesinghe has just presented to parliament a bill on the National Policy on Economic Transformation which includes the establishment of an Office for International Trade and the Sri Lanka Institute of Economics and International Trade.

Was SLSFTA a “Cleverly negotiated Free Trade Agreement” as stated by the (former) Minister of Development Strategies and International Trade Malik Samarawickrama during the Parliamentary Debate on the SLSFTA in July 2018, or a colossal blunder covered up with lies, false promises, and fairy tales? After SLSFTA was signed there were a number of fairy tales published on this agreement by the Ministry of Development Strategies and International, Institute of Policy Studies, and others.

However, for this article, I would like to limit my comments to the speech by Minister Samarawickrama during the Parliamentary Debate, and the two most important areas in the agreement which were covered up with lies, fairy tales, and false promises, namely: revenue loss for Sri Lanka and Investment from Singapore. On the other important area, “Waste products dumping” I do not want to comment here as I have written extensively on the issue.

1. The revenue loss

During the Parliamentary Debate in July 2018, Minister Samarawickrama stated “…. let me reiterate that this FTA with Singapore has been very cleverly negotiated by us…. The liberalisation programme under this FTA has been carefully designed to have the least impact on domestic industry and revenue collection. We have included all revenue sensitive items in the negative list of items which will not be subject to removal of tariff. Therefore, 97.8% revenue from Customs duty is protected. Our tariff liberalisation will take place over a period of 12-15 years! In fact, the revenue earned through tariffs on goods imported from Singapore last year was Rs. 35 billion.

The revenue loss for over the next 15 years due to the FTA is only Rs. 733 million– which when annualised, on average, is just Rs. 51 million. That is just 0.14% per year! So anyone who claims the Singapore FTA causes revenue loss to the Government cannot do basic arithmetic! Mr. Speaker, in conclusion, I call on my fellow members of this House – don’t mislead the public with baseless criticism that is not grounded in facts. Don’t look at petty politics and use these issues for your own political survival.”

I was surprised to read the minister’s speech because an article published in January 2018 in “The Straits Times“, based on information released by the Singaporean Negotiators stated, “…. With the FTA, tariff savings for Singapore exports are estimated to hit $10 million annually“.

As the annual tariff savings (that is the revenue loss for Sri Lanka) calculated by the Singaporean Negotiators, Singaporean $ 10 million (Sri Lankan rupees 1,200 million in 2018) was way above the rupees’ 733 million revenue loss for 15 years estimated by the Sri Lankan negotiators, it was clear to any observer that one of the parties to the agreement had not done the basic arithmetic!

Six years later, according to a report published by “The Morning” newspaper, speaking at the Committee on Public Finance (COPF) on 7th May 2024, Mr Samarawickrama’s chief trade negotiator K.J. Weerasinghehad had admitted “…. that forecasted revenue loss for the Government of Sri Lanka through the Singapore FTA is Rs. 450 million in 2023 and Rs. 1.3 billion in 2024.”

If these numbers are correct, as tariff liberalisation under the SLSFTA has just started, we will pass Rs 2 billion very soon. Then, the question is how Sri Lanka’s trade negotiators made such a colossal blunder. Didn’t they do their basic arithmetic? If they didn’t know how to do basic arithmetic they should have at least done their basic readings. For example, the headline of the article published in The Straits Times in January 2018 was “Singapore, Sri Lanka sign FTA, annual savings of $10m expected”.

Anyway, as Sri Lanka’s chief negotiator reiterated at the COPF meeting that “…. since 99% of the tariffs in Singapore have zero rates of duty, Sri Lanka has agreed on 80% tariff liberalisation over a period of 15 years while expecting Singapore investments to address the imbalance in trade,” let’s turn towards investment.

Investment from Singapore

In July 2018, speaking during the Parliamentary Debate on the FTA this is what Minister Malik Samarawickrama stated on investment from Singapore, “Already, thanks to this FTA, in just the past two-and-a-half months since the agreement came into effect we have received a proposal from Singapore for investment amounting to $ 14.8 billion in an oil refinery for export of petroleum products. In addition, we have proposals for a steel manufacturing plant for exports ($ 1 billion investment), flour milling plant ($ 50 million), sugar refinery ($ 200 million). This adds up to more than $ 16.05 billion in the pipeline on these projects alone.

And all of these projects will create thousands of more jobs for our people. In principle approval has already been granted by the BOI and the investors are awaiting the release of land the environmental approvals to commence the project.

I request the Opposition and those with vested interests to change their narrow-minded thinking and join us to develop our country. We must always look at what is best for the whole community, not just the few who may oppose. We owe it to our people to courageously take decisions that will change their lives for the better.”

According to the media report I quoted earlier, speaking at the Committee on Public Finance (COPF) Chief Negotiator Weerasinghe has admitted that Sri Lanka was not happy with overall Singapore investments that have come in the past few years in return for the trade liberalisation under the Singapore-Sri Lanka Free Trade Agreement. He has added that between 2021 and 2023 the total investment from Singapore had been around $162 million!

What happened to those projects worth $16 billion negotiated, thanks to the SLSFTA, in just the two-and-a-half months after the agreement came into effect and approved by the BOI? I do not know about the steel manufacturing plant for exports ($ 1 billion investment), flour milling plant ($ 50 million) and sugar refinery ($ 200 million).

However, story of the multibillion-dollar investment in the Petroleum Refinery unfolded in a manner that would qualify it as the best fairy tale with false promises presented by our politicians and the officials, prior to 2019 elections.

Though many Sri Lankans got to know, through the media which repeatedly highlighted a plethora of issues surrounding the project and the questionable credentials of the Singaporean investor, the construction work on the Mirrijiwela Oil Refinery along with the cement factory began on the24th of March 2019 with a bang and Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe and his ministers along with the foreign and local dignitaries laid the foundation stones.

That was few months before the 2019 Presidential elections. Inaugurating the construction work Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe said the projects will create thousands of job opportunities in the area and surrounding districts.

The oil refinery, which was to be built over 200 acres of land, with the capacity to refine 200,000 barrels of crude oil per day, was to generate US$7 billion of exports and create 1,500 direct and 3,000 indirect jobs. The construction of the refinery was to be completed in 44 months. Four years later, in August 2023 the Cabinet of Ministers approved the proposal presented by President Ranil Wickremesinghe to cancel the agreement with the investors of the refinery as the project has not been implemented! Can they explain to the country how much money was wasted to produce that fairy tale?

It is obvious that the President, ministers, and officials had made huge blunders and had deliberately misled the public and the parliament on the revenue loss and potential investment from SLSFTA with fairy tales and false promises.

As the president himself said, a country cannot be developed by making false promises or with fairy tales and these false promises and fairy tales had bankrupted the country. “Unfortunately, many segments of the population have not come to realize this yet”.

(The writer, a specialist and an activist on trade and development issues . )

Continue Reading

Trending