Connect with us

Editorial

Does the U.S. deserve Donald Trump?

Published

on

Last week’s piece by Vijaya Chandrasoma in the Sunday Island (Sept. 10) was illustrated with two attention grabbing cartoons. One of them, depicting Donald Trump shackled by the ball and chain of a prisoner and a senile looking Joe Biden with a walking aide was particularly arresting. It eloquently depicted the stark choice before the voters at next year’s presidential elections in the U.S.

Trump entered the political scene in 2015, with no previous experience in politics or governance. His main claim to fame was his role in the popular reality TV show, The Apprentice, which he hosted for 14 seasons. He was fired by NBC for the derogatory, racist remarks he made about Mexican immigrants during the announcement of his candidacy for the 2016 presidency under the aegis of the Republican Party.

Donald Trump inherited a fortune of nearly $300 million on the death of his father, Fred Trump, in the late 1990s. Since then, he has had a checkered career in real estate, including the ownership of several international golf courses and hotels, office buildings and a now defunct casino in Atlantic City.

Fred’s career was no less checkered. He was arrested at a 1927 Memorial Day Ku Klux Klan parade, when 1000 white-robed Klansmen marched through the Jamaica, Queens neighborhood, spurring an all-out brawl in which seven were arrested, one of them being Fred Trump. Of course, Donald Trump denied these charges. “He was never arrested. He had nothing to do with this”, Donald told the Daily Mail during a 2015 interview. He added, “This never took place. And he was never even there. It’s a completely false story”. These comments parroted almost to the word the protestations Trump made in his defense for his role in the January 6 insurrection.

Never took place. Never even there. Completely false story. Fake News.

Fred Trump had inculcated a culture of racial discrimination in his son, a streak of racism and white supremacy that has never left Donald Trump. Trump had his college education at the prestigious Wharton Business School of the University of Pennsylvania, where he claims he graduated at the top of his class. However, late Professor of Marketing at Wharton, Dr William Kelley, said that “Donald Trump was the dumbest goddam student I ever had”. In 30 years of teaching.

Fast forward to 2015, when he embarked on his political career, leaving behind six bankruptcies, two wives, five children, 28 cases of sexual assault and numerous frauds and unpaid debts in his wake. Trump was one of 17 candidates for the Republican nomination in 2016, through which he bullied and lied his way to win by a large majority. A presidential contender with experience only in business failures and sexual assaults, running against undeniably the most qualified candidate for the presidency in US history.

Hillary Clinton, the Democratic nominee in 2016, graduated from Yale Law School in 1973. Having served as a congressional legal counsel, she moved to Arkansas, where she married Bill Clinton, whom she had met at Yale Law. She served as the First Lady of Arkansas (1979 to 1981 and again from 1983 to 1992), the First Lady of the United States (1992 to 2000) and Senator of the United States (2001 to 2009). She lost the Democratic nomination to President Barack Obama in 2008, who appointed her to his cabinet as Secretary of State in 2009.

With an impeccable record in politics and governance, running against a vulgar, failed businessman and sexual predator, Hillary was the overwhelming favorite to win the 2016 presidency. As election day neared, Hillary was enjoying a comfortable lead, when her popularity started eroding with news about the use of her private server for government business; but she was mainly outmaneuvered by false rumors spread about her on social media, with a little bit of help from friends of Russian President Putin, who seemed to have a special bond with Trump.

Trump won the 2016 presidency with a comfortable Electoral College majority of 304/227, though Clinton won the popular vote by nearly three million votes. Trump inherited from President Obama a healthy economy, with 72 continuous weeks of economic growth and the lowest unemployment and inflation rates in decades. Trump immediately claimed that this great economy was created by him alone.

The four years of Trump’s first and only term cannot be fully described with justice in this comment, but three “achievements” are worthy of special mention. He immediately showed his appreciation of his donors with a tax cut of $1.5 trillion, which reduced the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, helping only the super-wealthy and leaving the most vulnerable out in the cold; the denial of the deadly spread of the Covid pandemic and the stubborn refusal to impose protective measures, which caused hundreds of thousands of avoidable deaths; and the piece de resistance – planning and inciting a violent insurrection at the seat of the nation’s democracy, the Capitol, in a desperate attempt to cling on to power.

The mystery for the ages is that a man who has been allowed to polarize the richest, most powerful nation in the world to the cusp of civil war; who has been charged, arrested and on bail for 91 felonies, including obstruction of justice, espionage and sedition; and who has vowed to imprison his political opponents if he wins the 2024 election. Such a man is still the favorite for the Republican Party nomination for the presidency, with a fair chance of regaining the White House in 2024.



Editorial

Ensure safety of COPF Chairman

Published

on

Saturday 8th June, 2024

It was with shock and dismay that we received the news about death threats to COPF (Committee on Public Finance) Chairman Dr. Harsha de Silva over the ongoing parliamentary probe into the on-arrival visa scam. Dr. de Silva yesterday told Speaker Mahinda Yapa Abeywardena, in Parliament, that he was facing death threats and intimidation, and it was incumbent upon Parliament to ensure his safety. He stopped short of naming names, but revealed that some ruling party MPs were among those who had ganged up against him. The Speaker only said there had been no complaint, and he would look into the matter.

The SLPP-UNP government has been doing everything in its power to have all parliamentary committees under its thumb. The COPE (Committee on Public Enterprises), which once helped restore public faith in the legislature by exposing state sector corruption, has now become a mere appendage of the incumbent regime, thanks to the appointment of SLPP MP Rohitha Abeygunawardena as its Chairman. The SLPP-UNP combine also tried to oust COPF Chairman Dr. de Silva, but in vain. However, it knows more than one way to shoe a horse.

The COPF, under Dr. de Silva’s chairmanship, has been a thorn in the side of the government, which is struggling to cover up numerous corrupt deals. Dr. de Silva yesterday told Parliament that he found it extremely difficult to function as the COPF head due to severe resource constraints his committee was facing; he himself had to pay the salaries of some of his staff members besides burning the midnight oil.

The sheer workload he had to cope with as the COPF chief had taken its toll on his health, he said, informing the Speaker that he was at the end of his tether, and at times thought of resigning from the COPF. This is exactly what the government wants him to do; resource squeezes and threats are aimed at making him quit.

On 26 May, Dr. de Silva revealed, in an ‘X’ post, that the COPF had uncovered some vital information about the visa scam and it would reveal everything after its final meeting on the issue; the COPF was committed to exposing the truth behind the controversial tender, he added. In an editorial comment on 27 May, we warned him.

While thanking him for his bold stand, we pointed out that by making such a statement, he had thrown caution to the wind, and become a marked target, with the government making an all-out effort to delay the COPF investigation lest the truth should come out much to the detriment of its interests in this election year. Unfortunately, what was feared has come about; Dr. de Silva is complaining of death threats and government moves to strangulate the COPF financially to derail its investigations.

Dr. de Silva’s predicament exemplifies the fate that befalls the few good men and women in Parliament. It is hoped that all those who seek an end to the state sector corruption will rally behind Dr. de Silva, and bring pressure to bear on the government to ensure his safety. Let Dr. de Silva be urged to reveal the names of those who have issued threats, veiled or otherwise, to him and are trying to scuttle the COPF probes.

Continue Reading

Editorial

Dead man walking!

Published

on

Friday 7th June, 2024

The SLPP-UNP government is going hell for leather to make bad laws as if there were no tomorrow. It is abusing its parliamentary majority, which has been retained with the help of some crossovers, for that purpose. The Opposition, the media and trade unions are up in arms, and understandably so. The incumbent regime is a dead man walking; it is so desperate that it is capable of anything. Hence the need for it to be restrained.

The Electricity (Amendment) Bill (EAB) plunged Parliament into turmoil yesterday, but the government secured its passage. The Supreme Court (SC) determined the entire EAB inconsistent with the Constitution and recommended changes thereto. After unveiling the Bill, sometime ago, Minister of Power and Energy Kanchana Wijesekera hailed it as an excellent piece of legislation aimed at straightening up the power sector to serve the public interest better.

The SC determination left him with egg on his face. He reminded us of the proverbial curate who, while eating a stale egg, assured his host, a Bishop, that parts of it were excellent. Wijesekera’s egg, as it were, made Parliament stink yesterday, but he sought to please his masters by praising it as a silver bullet.

EAB should have been discarded and a new one drafted in consultation with all stakeholders. But the government is apparently driven by an ulterior motive; its aim is not to serve Sri Lanka’s interests but to look after those of some moneybags.

It is not uncommon for Bills to contain some flaws, which are rectified either before or during the committee stage. But there is something terribly wrong with draft Bills that are full of sections inconsistent with the Constitution. The drafters of EAB have demonstrated their sheer ignorance of the supreme law, and that they are not equal to the task of drafting Bills. If they had read the Constitution at least perfunctorily, they would not have drafted such a bad law.

Ignorant and incompetent, they do not deserve to be paid with public funds and must be sent back to law school. They must be summoned before Parliament and questioned on their serious lapses, which have caused public faith in the national legislature to diminish.

Curiously, the MPs who demand that judges, doctors, Central Bankers, and other public officials be summoned before Parliament have taken badly drafted Bills for granted. The power sector trade unions yesterday alleged that EAB was of Indian origin and geared towards furthering the interests of Adani Group at the expense of Sri Lanka.

Most critics of EAB are agreeable in principle to the need for power sector reforms; the Ceylon Electricity Board should be given a radical shake-up, and transformed into a modern organisation capable of providing a better service at a lower cost. They only asked the government to tread cautiously, consulting all stakeholders and taking action to ensure that the country’s interests prevailed over everything else. But the government was in a mighty hurry to steamroller the Bill through Parliament, making the Opposition ask whether it was doing so at the behest of some external forces involved in controversial power generation deals here.

What is passed by the current Parliament can be either amended or abolished by a future parliament in a constitutionally prescribed manner. But that does not mean that a government is free to pass bad laws, making the country enter into long-term agreements with powerful nations and their investors. It looks as if the SLPP-UNP regime did not care two hoots about the consequences of its actions.

Continue Reading

Editorial

Modi Magic on the wane

Published

on

Thursday 6th June, 2024

The outcome of India’s parliamentary election (2024) has led to a ‘perspective ambiguity’. Prime Minister Narendra Modi lost no time in declaring victory for the BJP-led NDA alliance, which secured 293 seats in the 543-member Parliament, but he must be a worried man. The BJP is short of 32 seats to form a government under its own steam; it has lost 63 seats or about 20% of its parliamentary strength. It had 303 seats in the previous Parliament, and that number has dropped to 240.

Modi has become the second Indian Prime Minister to win a third term. The first PM to do so was Jawaharlal Nehru. But Nehru won an outright majority in Parliament in 1962; Modi has had to depend on smaller parties in his alliance to retain his hold on power. Modi must be reeling from a sharp drop in his victory margin in his own constituency, Varanasi; it has decreased to 152,000 from 480,000 in 2019 whereas Modi’s bete noire, Rahul Gandhi, won Raebareli by a staggering 390,000 votes.

Modi, who reigned supreme with 303 seats in the previous Parliament, is now dependent on parties such as Nitish Kumar’s JD-U and Chandrababu Naidu’s TDP to form a government. He has had to lead an alliance of strange bedfellows. Both Kumar and Naidu were bitter critics of Modi. Kumar helped form the oppositional alliance, the INDIA bloc, before switching his allegiance to PM Modi. Naidu also closed ranks with the BJP in the run-up to the election. These politicians have been described as extremely ambitious and highly unpredictable, and whether Modi will be able to manage them and consolidate his grip on the NDA alliance remains to be seen. They will demand plum ministerial posts in return for their support. The TDP is said to be eyeing Transport and Health portfolios! That is the name of the game in coalition politics, where it is not uncommon for the tail to wag the dog, so to speak. These two political leaders are however not the only problem Modi will have to contend with. The next five years will feel like an eternity for PM Modi.

Nothing would have been more shocking for the BJP than its defeat in Uttar Pradesh’s Faizabad constituency, where the Ram Mandir has been built. Modi may have thought he would be able to win the Lok Sabha election hands down after the consecration of that temple, which became a centrepiece of the BJP’s election campaign. The BJP lost that seat to the Samajwadi Party! Modi must be disappointed that the Ram Mandir hype failed to trigger a massive wave of support for his party. This particular defeat signifies a massive setback for the BJP’s ethno-religious agenda.

Modi’s divisive election campaign failed to yield the desired result. The BJP’s failure to secure an outright majority could be attributed to a host of factors, some of them being the suppression of the Opposition, the arrogance of power, chronic unemployment, and the rising cost of living. The BJP also did not care to reimage itself in a positive light to attract the youth.

Modi will hereafter see the Congress-led INDIA bloc with 223 seats, in his rearview mirror. The Congress (99 seats) and its allies have eaten into the BJP support base considerably, but they have a long way to go before being able to capture power.

The bumpy ride ahead for the BJP-led coalition government to be formed may improve the INDIA bloc’s chances of bettering their electoral performance and turning the tables on the BJP and its allies in time to come. Modi will have a lot to worry about in his third term.

Continue Reading

Trending