Sports
The incomparable Vijaya Malalasekera
By Rohan Wijeyaratna
It was the Royal – Thomian of 1963. Royal batting second were facing a formidable Thomian total of 254 for 8 declared. Before long they were heading for trouble at 34 for 3. That’s when a fresh-faced youngster still only 17, made his way to the middle. Before his arrival, he was subjected to a copious dousing of well-meant advice from Saliya Atapattu – a former Royal sporting personality, seated next to him in the pavilion. It was all about what must be done to avert a possible calamity, since that possibility now seemed staring Royal, squarely in the face.
Distinctly funereal
As if to confirm Saliya Attapattu’s worst fears were no stretch of his imagination, Royal were soon 42 for 4 when Tony Sirimanne (later of CR fame) snared the scalp of the Royal skipper S.S. Kumar for very little. Let alone overhauling the Thomians, getting past the follow-on mark now seemed a distant dream for the Reid Avenue boys. The Thomian attack consisted of burly Roger D’ Silva, Barney Reid, Tony Sirimanne, Panditharatne and Sarath Seneviratne, and as Cedric Fernando now wended his way to join Vijaya Malalasekera in the middle, the mood in the Royal camp was distinctly funereal, while the noise from the Thomian camp threatened to lift the pavilion rafters.
Roger D’Silva with his tail up, was bowling like the wind, and Barney Reid was doing his usual thing – bowling spin and swing with mesmeric skill and guile, out-foxing everyone standing 20 yards away. With Cedric Fernando’s arrival, everyone resigned to expect the worst.
That was when the perfect anti-climax slowly began to unravel.
Took the bull by the horns
Malalasekera -a fresh faced lad, strong of build and even stronger of temperament, wasn’t the type to die wondering. Being a cricketing buccaneer of sorts, he quickly ditched Saliya Attapattu’s well meant advice, no sooner he got up from his pavilion seat. Deciding instead to take the bull by its horns, Malalasekera cut loose with an array of stinging square cuts, drives, pulls and hooks, against Roger D’ Silva’s menacing pace. Then he proceeded to nullify Barney Reid’s nagging accuracy, guile and cunning, by unleashing an array of strokes of such breathtaking fury, they were now being wildly cheered by even those in the Thomian camp, who by then had reached an advanced state of inebriation and didn’t know who was doing what. Noisy pavilion banter argued whether or not this was the most furious innings ever seen at a Royal-Thomian. Let there be no mistake; this was no exhibition of vulgar village green hitting. Instead, it was fearsomely orthodox stroke play, executed with immense power and precision. In short, it was reminiscent of an Everton Weekes’ innings when in full flow. Some of Vijaya’s drives to the cover boundary were of such ferocity and force, the ball would hit the short parapet wall at the front of block C or D at the Oval, and ricochet right back to the actual playing strip! Thanks to this unprecedented assault, Malalasekera reached a sensational hundred in just two hours and 10 minutes on either side of lunch on day two. That innings which contained 20 fours and one six turned the flow of the game on its head, and to date ranks as one of the most fiercest exhibitions of sustained hitting ever seen in the entire history of the Royal-Thomian. Shortly after that blitzkrieg, Royal declared at 207 for four.
Hadrian’s wall
Throughout it all, Cedric Fernando served as the perfect foil for Vijaya, presenting a bat which rivalled Hadrian’s great wall beyond which no ball could pass. No amount of praise would do him justice for the role he played in this gallant partnership. Although playing second fiddle, Fernando played a stellar role in the proceedings and at the declaration was unbeaten on 47. Malalasekera remained unbowed on 112,whilst playing the innings of his life.
Never a selfish cricketer
Vijaya Malalasekera was never a selfish cricketer. Instead, he was a supremely confident young man with a cavalier bent, ready and willing at all time to back his own instincts. Not in a conceited way, he was cocky up to his eye-lashes, of his own abilities. It was not in his character to tailor his innings to make good his promise to his parents, that should they come down from London to witness the match, he would make a hundred. Grapevine rumour has it that the father in a moment of light headed recklessness had responded saying that in that event, he would secure his son a seat at Cambridge. Being Ceylon’s Ambassador in England at the time, there was not a lot Gunapala Malalasekera could not do, given the esteem in which he was held in those parts. But Vijaya being Vijaya and therefore hugely popular and totally out-going in a literal and metaphorical sense, had little time for study whilst at Royal. As things panned out Vijaya secured his place at Cambridge after acquiring the necessary entrance requirements in England. The story heard through the grapevine of his father’s promise to get him to Cambridge in return for a ‘big match’ hundred may be or mayn’t be true, but it is a good story and therefore shall be retained. What is definitely true however, is that his sporting stock rose considerably after his ‘big match’ performance and tilted the scales in his favour, when the prestigious ‘Schoolboy Cricketer of the Year’ award was announced. That was a fitting culmination to a terrific season for this hugely popular, fun loving young man.
On the strength of that one inning Vijaya Malalasekera was included in the Colts XI which played the University in a crucial game which would decide the Sara Trophy champions for that year. Malalasekera played a brief but trademark innings as Colts got the better of their opponents who went on to win the championship on points. That was the only Sara trophy game Vijaya played in Ceylon, before proceeding to England to join his parents. With his departure, he forewent the Royal College captaincy the following year.
Having fulfilled the entrance requirements and charmed his way past the Admissions Tutor at Fitzwilliam College in Cambridge, Malalasekera was in like a breeze and allowed to read for a degree in Law in 1966.
Murray asked to leave
Much like Lorenz Pereira of a slightly earlier vintage and quite predictably, Vijaya enjoyed his life at Cambridge to the fullest. So did one Deryck Murray, who kept wicket for the West Indies and captained the Varsity at cricket in 1965 and 1966. Murray took an instant liking to Vijaya, both for his style of batting and his approach to life. In fact, Murray tended to enjoy himself so much, he was kindly asked to leave the University by the end of his second year whilst being Captain of Cambridge! The social life at Cambridge seemed irresistible to some, and a source of immense distraction to cavalier cricketers, who were unwilling to have their noses constantly pore over their books while the bright lights beckoned. In Malalasekera’s first year (1966) while batting at No 6, he played 24 innings in 13 first class matches, making 323 runs with a highest score of 80 at an average of 13.45. Against Essex in his very first match Vijaya batting in the same vein as his ‘Big Match’ innings of 1963, pummeled a brilliant 80 against the likes of Barry Knight, Robin Hobbs and Ray East, and against Northants, he made an attractive 72 teaming up with Deryck Murray to record the highest Cambridge total for the season. But as Wisden pointed out, “….. V.P. Malalasekera from Ceylon, flattered only to deceive too often.” All told, Cambridge enjoyed a poor season in 1966.
Peter May’s admiration
Having enjoyed a reasonably successful first year, Malalasekera failed to become an automatic choice the following year as his magical form deserted him. Consequently, and much to his chagrin he was left out of the Cambridge side, and was playing for the Fitzwilliam College XI instead; a crushing blow to a young man’s ego. However, in the annual Cambridge University v Quidnuncs (former Cantabrigians) fixture, Steve Russell, the Cambridge captain invited Malalasekera to open batting with All-Ceylon opener Mano Ponniah, who had by then, just joined the Varsity.
Stung by the fact that he was dropped from the Varsity team, Malalasekera on his way to the middle, somewhat nervously asked Ponniah not only to take first strike, but also to ‘take it easy’ against Test opening bowler Richard Hutton, who was tasked to open the proceedings. Ponniah taking first strike promptly forgot his solemn promise and gleefully took a single off the very first ball to get off strike. This brought Vijaya Malalasekera to face England Test paceman Richard Hutton, now in his prime.
As Ponniah recalls, nervousness was plainly visible on Vijaya’s face. In fact, his face seemed whiter than Hutton’s! That was before the ball arrived. It came at a screaming pace and left at a screaming pace. In-between, Malalasekera had leaned into it and stroked it superlatively on the up with such sublime timing and placement, the ball vanished like a startled banshee, gathering speed as it went. This was such a spectacular strike through the covers, Peter May standing at first slip could not resist applauding, and as he crossed to change ends at the end of the over, he stopped and asked Vijaya for his 2 lb 2 oz bat to have a closer look at it. Peter May the ex- English captain was renowned as one of the hardest strikers of a cricket ball in England in his glory days of active cricket.
Cambridge team pictured besides the Grace Gates at Lord’s. Vijay Malalasekera seated front row extreme right and Mano Ponniah standing second from right.
The first Asians to open for Cambridge
For the record, Mano Ponniah and Vijay Malalasekera were the first Asians to open for Cambridge in the Varsity game of 1967. This was Ponniah’s first year at Cambridge. Vijaya missed playing in the entire 1968 season, thanks to a troublesome shoulder injury.
Completing his degree the following year, Malalasekera proceeded to Law College, where he passed his Law exams in 1970. Reading his name on the notice board one day, he was so thrilled, he ran all the way to his erstwhile friend Gijra Rajapakse’s digs to break the news and proceeded to ring all known Sri Lankan friends to come along to London House to fittingly celebrate his success!
Chose his friends wisely
Unsurprisingly, Vijaya– at least outwardly -was a strong Buddhist. He was also an internationalist in every sense of the word. He saw no division amongst religions; a fact driven home by his marriage to Niri – a strong catholic. Gijra Rajapakse was the Bestman at the wedding. The story goes that Gijra, walking alongside Vijaya just seconds before they entered the church together, whispered in his ear “Malalasekera, the car is outside; in case you change your mind”. There was no gain saying Vijaya chose his closest friends wisely!
Among the hand luggage he carried with him on his way back to Ceylon was a book on Buddhism picked up on the way. Knowing that it was very likely his parents would be at the airport to greet him, Vijaya carried the book prominently in his hand to impress his father in particular, who was a leading light in Buddhist affairs back in Ceylon. The tactic some say, worked wonders!
Nearly decapitated….
On his return, Vijaya played a few Sara Trophy games for the NCC and then shifted to the CCC where he played some Daily News cricket. Mahen Dayananda of the CCC who shared many a partnership with him recalls walking up to Malalasekera and pleading with him on one occasion to hit his straight drives not so straight, lest he be decapitated at the non-striker’s end!
Malalasekera tried his hand at practicing law but soon decided to join the private sector instead. Shortly, he was heading the legal Department at Ceylon Tobacco Company, and ended up as its Corporate and Regulatory Affairs Director. Upon his retirement he was invited to join several other companies as a Board member, since his expertise, experience and knowledge on good governance were in high demand, and valued by many.
The first two Interim Committees
Following gun fire at the Cricket Board AGM in early 1999, President Chandrika Kumaratunge dissolved the Board and installed the first Interim Committee, headed by Rienzie Wijetilleke. That Committee came across as a breath of fresh air into the musty cricket administration at the time. However, they functioned for less than one year from June 1999, resigning from their posts in May 2000, owing to continual political intrigue exercised by those who should have known better. Not before long, the Cricket Board was again mired in controversy, necessitating higher powers to intervene. Possibly because she knew him personally and trusted in his ability and sincerity, Vijaya Malalasekera was appointed by President Chandrika Kumaratunge as Chairman of the second Interim Committee of the cricket Board in 2002. He accepted, but not before making it quite clear that he wished her to always fully back his judgment, failing which he would be gone. To her eternal credit, President Kumaratunge kept to her word and respected the understanding. Appointed alongside him were Michael Tissera, Sidath Wettimuny and Kushil Gunasekera, in what was one of the most productive and efficient Interim Committees the Board had ever known.
During Vijaya’s tenure, Sri Lanka registered a record ten straight Test wins under Sanath Jayasuriya’s captaincy. At least a part of that success must be credited to Vijaya’s leadership and methods of governance. He led by example. He was clear cut, forthright, bold and fearless in his decision making. Yet he was non interfering. He set an example and displayed sterling qualities of leadership. This trend cascaded to each rung below. He strongly believed a leader is only as good as his team. Men of proven worth and capability were invited to serve on the various sub-committees, and they were allowed to utilize their expertise and work without hindrance. Alas, that Interim Committee too wasn’t destined to remain long in office. In the political upheaval of late 2002, the Ministry of Sports went into the hands of a different ruling political faction and Vijaya Malalasekera for no valid reason was removed from his post as a consequence. That was the end of one of the most productive spells of cricket administration in this country.
Walked with Kings ……
Fun loving and friendly by nature, Vijaya Malalasekera was comfortable in any crowd, be it royalty or men from the street. He could – as the poet said – walk with Kings, yet not lose the common touch. Although a colourful cricketer and a ‘character’ in his own right, he proved in a spell of less than one year, that his greatest contribution to the game could have been through its administration. It was to the eternal misfortune of this country that it failed to use him considerably more, than it actually did!
Sports
England face Australia in the battle of champions
The first truly heavyweight clash of this expanded T20 World Cup format comes freighted with both history and subplots. A rematch of the 2010 World T20 final at Kensington Oval, the match pits Jos Buttler’s defending champions – who are aiming to become the first team to retain the trophy – against the Australian winning machine, victors at the 2021 edition and current world title-holders in Test and ODI cricket. And that’s before you throw in the Ashes for afters.
Already there is added pressure on England, after the rain in Bridgetown led to a share of the points in their opener against Scotland (and that having conceded 90 runs from 10 overs without taking a wicket in a tepid bowling display). Lose to their oldest rivals and it will leave their Super 8 prospects open to being waylaid by the perils of net run-rate calculations, or worse.
The Scotland match was the third abandonment in five suffered by England, after a rain-affected home series against Pakistan, which has clearly hampered their readiness for this campaign after almost six months without playing T20 together. It does not take much for a side to click in this format – and England looked in decent shape when they did get on the field against Pakistan – but Buttler will be anxious for things to go their way on Saturday, if only to avoid further questions referencing the team’s disastrous ODI World Cup defence last year.
Australia, under the laidback leadership of Mitchell Marsh would love nothing more than to add to the English sense of jeopardy – having helped bundle them out of the tournament in India on the way to taking the crown. Their head to head record is less impressive in T20 however, with England having won six of the last seven completed encounters, as well as that 2010 final.
Despite a wobble with the bat, Australia avoided mishap against Oman earlier in the week, the experience of David Warner and Marcus Stoinis shining through in difficult batting conditions. Surfaces in the Caribbean – not to mention those games staged in the USA – have already had teams scratching their heads; rather than the “slug-fest” England had prepared for, following a high-scoring tour of the Caribbean in December, it looks as if boxing smart may be the way to go.
Speaking of Warner, this could be the last time he faces up against England in national colours – and another match-winning contribution would likely reduce the chances of them meeting again in the knockouts. On the other side of the card is Jofra Archer, fresh from an emotional maiden outing at Kensington Oval and ready to take on Australia for the first time in any format since 2020. Can Mark Wood fire up England’s campaign, as he did during last summer’s Ashes? Will Pat Cummins be back to harass the old enemy once again? Seconds out, it’s almost time to rumble.
Cummins is set to return after being rested for the Oman game, which saw Mitchell Starc leave the field with cramp. Starc is understood to be fine and could keep his place – which would likely see Nathan Ellis miss out. Marsh is still not fit to bowl, with Australia likely to continue with the allrounder combination of Stoinis and Maxwell to give them cover.
Australia (probable XI): David Warner, Travis Head, Mitchell Marsh (capt), Glenn Maxwell, Marcus Stoinis, Josh Inglis (wk), Tim David, Pat Cummins, Nathan Ellis/Mitchell Starc, Adam Zampa, Josh Hazlewood
The one change England may consider is Reece Topley coming in for Wood, with the expectation that there will be some rotation among the seamers through the course of the tournament.
England (probable XI): Phil Salt, Jos Buttler (capt & wk), Will Jacks, Jonny Bairstow, Harry Brook, Liam Livingstone, Moeen Ali, Chris Jordan, Jofra Archer, Adil Rashid, Reece Topley/Mark Wood
[Cricinfo]
Sports
South Africa up against their bogey team in batter-unfriendly New York
Once is coincidence, twice is a clue, and three times is proof.
To paraphrase Agatha Christie, that is the narrative around South Africa’s meeting with Netherlands at this T20 World Cup.
The Dutch beat South Africa at the 2022 tournament and ended their semi-final hopes in a match where South Africa appeared to be sleep walking, and then beat them again at the 2023 ODI World Cup, where they exposed South Africa’s vulnerability in the chase. If they to do the treble, not only will Netherlands take the lead in Group D, but they will offer conclusive evidence of the threat they pose to Full Members, especially South Africa.
Of course, it will take some doing after South Africa’s opening performance against Sri Lanka, where they reduced their opposition to their lowest T20I total and chased it down in fairly straightforward fashion thanks to the most stable middle-order of their white-ball era. In Aiden Markram, Tristan Stubbs, Heinrich Klaasen and David Miller, South Africa have bankers and big-hitters and, for this match, they also have the advantage of experience. They’ve already played at Eisenhower Park, and have first-hand knowledge that run-scoring doesn’t come easily;Klassen said they are prepared to use their “cricket brains” and play “smarter cricket”.
But the conditions could be good news for Netherlands, who are not naturally a line-up of big hitters and build their innings on a foundation of turning ones into twos. In other words, they tend to take a slightly more conservative approach to batting, which may work well here, but they’ll be wary of the uneven bounce of the surface and will have to come up with plans to counterattack especially against South Africa’s seamers. Their own bowlers were exemplary in Dallas and will look to build on that performance against a line-up that will likely be more proactive than Nepal’s, but who they have managed to keep quiet not once, but twice in the past. Third time’s the charm, they say.
Anrich Nortje’s stunning return to form against Sri Lanka means South Africa may not have to tinker with the bowling combination, and Gerald Coetzee and Tabraiz Shamsi may have to wait their turns to get a game. The batting line-up should be unchanged, with no space for Ryan Rickelton yet.
South Africa: Quinton de Kock (wk), Reeza Hendricks, Aiden Markam, Tristan Stubbs, Heinrich Klaasen (wk), David Miller, Marco Jansen, Keshav Maharaj, Kagiso Rabada, Ottneil Baartman, Anrich Nortje
Conditions in New York may tempt Netherlands to include an extra seamer and they have Kyle Klein in their squad. But it could come at the expense of a shortened batting line-up and they may not want to risk that.
Netherlands: Michael Levitt, Max O’Dowd, Vikramjit Singh, Sybrand Engelbrecht, Scott Edwards (capt, wk), Bas de Leede, Teja Nidamanuru, Logan van Beek, Tim Pringle, Paul van Meekeren, Vivian Kingma
[Cricinfo]
Latest News
Mustafizur, Rishad, Hridoy dazzle in Bangladesh’s tight two-wicket win over Sri Lanka
Nuwan Thushara’s last over brought Sri Lanka screaming back into the match,as he first bowled Rishad Hossain, and then nailed Taskin Ahmed in front of the stumps with a pinpoint swinging yorker. This left Bangladesh eight wickets down, with 12 runs still to get.
However, the experienced Mahmudullah was at the crease for Bangladesh, and despite some further nervy moments, pushed Bangladesh across the line off the last ball of the 19th over.
But this was a match chiefly decided by Bangladesh’s own outstanding bowling. Mustafizur Rahman was the best among them, using shorter lengths and his cutters efficiently, to claim figures of 3 for 17. Rishad Hossain’s three-for through the middle overs also kept Sri Lanka quiet.
Mustafizur was instrumental in Sri Lanka’s downward spiral through the middle overs, which culminated in a crash-and-burn end. Ultimately, their inability to find boundaries, or even rotate strike against good Bangladesh bowling resulted in their downfall. A score of 125 for 9 always seemed poor on a decent pitch, even if their bowlers made a match of it in the end.
Brief scores:
Bangladesh 125 for 8 in 19 overs (Towhid Hridoy 40, Litton Das 36; Dhanajaya de Silva 1-11, Nuwan Thushara 4-18, Wanidu Hasaranga 2-32, Matheesha Pathirana 1-27) beat Sri Lanka124 for 9 in 20 overs (Pathum Nissanka 47, Dhananjaya de Silva 21; Tanzim Hasan Sakib 1-24, Taskin Ahmed 2-25, Mustafizur Rahman 3-17, Rishad Hossain 3-22) by two wickets
[Cricinfo]