Editorial
Trump again? God forbid
Thanks to regular columnist Vijaya Chandrasoma’s incisive contributions on political developments in the USA, readers of this newspaper have been able to get a good understanding of what is happening in one of the world’s greatest democracies, in the run-up to its presidential election next year.
Donald Trump is the current front-line candidate for the Republican ticket at the forthcoming election in November 2024, leading his four rivals by more than 40 points in the latest polls. Trump did not even bother to participate in the fourth debate held in Tuscaloosa, Alabama last Wednesday, the final debate before the first of the Republican primaries scheduled in Iowa for January, 2024.
His performance during his first presidential term, his personal vulgarity, his refusal to accept a clear defeat and the havoc he unleashed after the last presidential election results were declared are good enough reasons, most would think, for Trump to be convicted for sedition and obstruction of justice and imprisoned for a considerable period of time. Not so in America, though, for two main reasons.
One, the delays in the US justice system, which takes months, if not years, to conclude the legal processes to be negotiated even to initiate a trial. Even, or rather, especially, trials of an accused criminal like former President Trump, whose main legal objective is to delay those he faces on four indictments and 91 felonies until after the 2024 election. Which he expects to win, and as President, he will then pardon himself for federal crimes and claim executive immunity for state offenses.
Two, white supremacy and privilege are so deeply entrenched in the so-called “greatest democracy in the world”, that there is one law for the white and privileged, another for the indigent and colored. It would be impossible to imagine the fate which would have befallen African-American President Barack Obama, had he behaved just once the way Trump behaved every day in his four years at the White House. Obama was reviled by Fox News, the Republican Party propaganda arm, for wearing a tan suit at a press conference, the only “scandal” during his two-term presidency!
Many political commentators believed that the election to the presidency of Obama in 2008 and his re-election four years later signaled the beginning of the end of racial prejudice in America. At last, the enactments of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, were showing promise of the erosion of the evils of segregation and employment discrimination from the Jim Crow era. Perhaps the day of the dream of the Rev. Martin Luther King, “that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character” had finally dawned.
In fact, one of the most popular and astute political satirists of the time, Jon Stewart, made the memorable statement the night Obama was elected to the Presidency in November 2008: “At last we have become what we said we were”!
Nothing could have been further from the truth. Obama’s election to the highest position in the land unleashed deep-seated feelings of white supremacy, which had been seething at such depths under the surface that they were almost invisible. Chandrasoma says that during the two decades he lived in the USA at the turn of the century, seven years in the then deep-red state of Arizona, the only racial hatred he felt was after 9/11, when he was mistaken for an Arab. In fact, where education was concerned, he says minorities were at an advantage, during the Clinton years, especially if they were poor. He recalls his daughter thanking him for being the greatest father in the world, if only because his poverty enabled her to secure student loans to attend the best universities in the world with ease!
Trump, who had no previous experience in governing or public service, won the 2016 election, defeating Hillary Clinton, one of the most qualified and experienced presidential candidates in history. There were many subterfuges and Russian trickery involved in his victory, not the least of which was his exploitation of the racism of white Americans, incensed at the election of a black president. Especially one who graced the presidency with two terms of competency and compassion, without a trace of scandal, personal or political.
When Trump lost the presidency in 2020 in what was, according to election and judicial authorities, one of the fairest elections in US history, he called Foul and refused to concede defeat. Much has been written about his subsequent criminal behavior, his Big Lie about a stolen election, his incitement of a violent insurrection in an attempt to prevent the constitutional and peaceful transfer of power, and his persistent claim that he has been the victim of the greatest witch-hunt in history. This is a claim that has been embraced, in the face of the most conclusive evidence, by the Republican base, in their desperation to maintain their fantasy of a Christian white supremacist state.
Trump has already made it abundantly clear that, if he wins a second term, he will terminate the constitution, and place the entire executive branch under his complete control, which will enable him to employ only those loyal to him in the federal government. In a recent interview, when asked if he would abuse the power of the presidency if re-elected, Trump confirmed that he would, only on the first day, when he would close the southern border, fire all federal employees, judges and prosecutors who had been disloyal to him, and “drill, baby, drill” with no thoughts of pollution and climate change.
The most powerful nation, the leader of the free world, may well be reduced to just another Banana Republic, though, frighteningly, one with the greatest nuclear arsenal in the world; and with a madman in control.
Saturday 8th June, 2024
It was with shock and dismay that we received the news about death threats to COPF (Committee on Public Finance) Chairman Dr. Harsha de Silva over the ongoing parliamentary probe into the on-arrival visa scam. Dr. de Silva yesterday told Speaker Mahinda Yapa Abeywardena, in Parliament, that he was facing death threats and intimidation, and it was incumbent upon Parliament to ensure his safety. He stopped short of naming names, but revealed that some ruling party MPs were among those who had ganged up against him. The Speaker only said there had been no complaint, and he would look into the matter.
The SLPP-UNP government has been doing everything in its power to have all parliamentary committees under its thumb. The COPE (Committee on Public Enterprises), which once helped restore public faith in the legislature by exposing state sector corruption, has now become a mere appendage of the incumbent regime, thanks to the appointment of SLPP MP Rohitha Abeygunawardena as its Chairman. The SLPP-UNP combine also tried to oust COPF Chairman Dr. de Silva, but in vain. However, it knows more than one way to shoe a horse.
The COPF, under Dr. de Silva’s chairmanship, has been a thorn in the side of the government, which is struggling to cover up numerous corrupt deals. Dr. de Silva yesterday told Parliament that he found it extremely difficult to function as the COPF head due to severe resource constraints his committee was facing; he himself had to pay the salaries of some of his staff members besides burning the midnight oil.
The sheer workload he had to cope with as the COPF chief had taken its toll on his health, he said, informing the Speaker that he was at the end of his tether, and at times thought of resigning from the COPF. This is exactly what the government wants him to do; resource squeezes and threats are aimed at making him quit.
On 26 May, Dr. de Silva revealed, in an ‘X’ post, that the COPF had uncovered some vital information about the visa scam and it would reveal everything after its final meeting on the issue; the COPF was committed to exposing the truth behind the controversial tender, he added. In an editorial comment on 27 May, we warned him.
While thanking him for his bold stand, we pointed out that by making such a statement, he had thrown caution to the wind, and become a marked target, with the government making an all-out effort to delay the COPF investigation lest the truth should come out much to the detriment of its interests in this election year. Unfortunately, what was feared has come about; Dr. de Silva is complaining of death threats and government moves to strangulate the COPF financially to derail its investigations.
Dr. de Silva’s predicament exemplifies the fate that befalls the few good men and women in Parliament. It is hoped that all those who seek an end to the state sector corruption will rally behind Dr. de Silva, and bring pressure to bear on the government to ensure his safety. Let Dr. de Silva be urged to reveal the names of those who have issued threats, veiled or otherwise, to him and are trying to scuttle the COPF probes.
Friday 7th June, 2024
The SLPP-UNP government is going hell for leather to make bad laws as if there were no tomorrow. It is abusing its parliamentary majority, which has been retained with the help of some crossovers, for that purpose. The Opposition, the media and trade unions are up in arms, and understandably so. The incumbent regime is a dead man walking; it is so desperate that it is capable of anything. Hence the need for it to be restrained.
The Electricity (Amendment) Bill (EAB) plunged Parliament into turmoil yesterday, but the government secured its passage. The Supreme Court (SC) determined the entire EAB inconsistent with the Constitution and recommended changes thereto. After unveiling the Bill, sometime ago, Minister of Power and Energy Kanchana Wijesekera hailed it as an excellent piece of legislation aimed at straightening up the power sector to serve the public interest better.
The SC determination left him with egg on his face. He reminded us of the proverbial curate who, while eating a stale egg, assured his host, a Bishop, that parts of it were excellent. Wijesekera’s egg, as it were, made Parliament stink yesterday, but he sought to please his masters by praising it as a silver bullet.
EAB should have been discarded and a new one drafted in consultation with all stakeholders. But the government is apparently driven by an ulterior motive; its aim is not to serve Sri Lanka’s interests but to look after those of some moneybags.
It is not uncommon for Bills to contain some flaws, which are rectified either before or during the committee stage. But there is something terribly wrong with draft Bills that are full of sections inconsistent with the Constitution. The drafters of EAB have demonstrated their sheer ignorance of the supreme law, and that they are not equal to the task of drafting Bills. If they had read the Constitution at least perfunctorily, they would not have drafted such a bad law.
Ignorant and incompetent, they do not deserve to be paid with public funds and must be sent back to law school. They must be summoned before Parliament and questioned on their serious lapses, which have caused public faith in the national legislature to diminish.
Curiously, the MPs who demand that judges, doctors, Central Bankers, and other public officials be summoned before Parliament have taken badly drafted Bills for granted. The power sector trade unions yesterday alleged that EAB was of Indian origin and geared towards furthering the interests of Adani Group at the expense of Sri Lanka.
Most critics of EAB are agreeable in principle to the need for power sector reforms; the Ceylon Electricity Board should be given a radical shake-up, and transformed into a modern organisation capable of providing a better service at a lower cost. They only asked the government to tread cautiously, consulting all stakeholders and taking action to ensure that the country’s interests prevailed over everything else. But the government was in a mighty hurry to steamroller the Bill through Parliament, making the Opposition ask whether it was doing so at the behest of some external forces involved in controversial power generation deals here.
What is passed by the current Parliament can be either amended or abolished by a future parliament in a constitutionally prescribed manner. But that does not mean that a government is free to pass bad laws, making the country enter into long-term agreements with powerful nations and their investors. It looks as if the SLPP-UNP regime did not care two hoots about the consequences of its actions.
Thursday 6th June, 2024
The outcome of India’s parliamentary election (2024) has led to a ‘perspective ambiguity’. Prime Minister Narendra Modi lost no time in declaring victory for the BJP-led NDA alliance, which secured 293 seats in the 543-member Parliament, but he must be a worried man. The BJP is short of 32 seats to form a government under its own steam; it has lost 63 seats or about 20% of its parliamentary strength. It had 303 seats in the previous Parliament, and that number has dropped to 240.
Modi has become the second Indian Prime Minister to win a third term. The first PM to do so was Jawaharlal Nehru. But Nehru won an outright majority in Parliament in 1962; Modi has had to depend on smaller parties in his alliance to retain his hold on power. Modi must be reeling from a sharp drop in his victory margin in his own constituency, Varanasi; it has decreased to 152,000 from 480,000 in 2019 whereas Modi’s bete noire, Rahul Gandhi, won Raebareli by a staggering 390,000 votes.
Modi, who reigned supreme with 303 seats in the previous Parliament, is now dependent on parties such as Nitish Kumar’s JD-U and Chandrababu Naidu’s TDP to form a government. He has had to lead an alliance of strange bedfellows. Both Kumar and Naidu were bitter critics of Modi. Kumar helped form the oppositional alliance, the INDIA bloc, before switching his allegiance to PM Modi. Naidu also closed ranks with the BJP in the run-up to the election. These politicians have been described as extremely ambitious and highly unpredictable, and whether Modi will be able to manage them and consolidate his grip on the NDA alliance remains to be seen. They will demand plum ministerial posts in return for their support. The TDP is said to be eyeing Transport and Health portfolios! That is the name of the game in coalition politics, where it is not uncommon for the tail to wag the dog, so to speak. These two political leaders are however not the only problem Modi will have to contend with. The next five years will feel like an eternity for PM Modi.
Nothing would have been more shocking for the BJP than its defeat in Uttar Pradesh’s Faizabad constituency, where the Ram Mandir has been built. Modi may have thought he would be able to win the Lok Sabha election hands down after the consecration of that temple, which became a centrepiece of the BJP’s election campaign. The BJP lost that seat to the Samajwadi Party! Modi must be disappointed that the Ram Mandir hype failed to trigger a massive wave of support for his party. This particular defeat signifies a massive setback for the BJP’s ethno-religious agenda.
Modi’s divisive election campaign failed to yield the desired result. The BJP’s failure to secure an outright majority could be attributed to a host of factors, some of them being the suppression of the Opposition, the arrogance of power, chronic unemployment, and the rising cost of living. The BJP also did not care to reimage itself in a positive light to attract the youth.
Modi will hereafter see the Congress-led INDIA bloc with 223 seats, in his rearview mirror. The Congress (99 seats) and its allies have eaten into the BJP support base considerably, but they have a long way to go before being able to capture power.
The bumpy ride ahead for the BJP-led coalition government to be formed may improve the INDIA bloc’s chances of bettering their electoral performance and turning the tables on the BJP and its allies in time to come. Modi will have a lot to worry about in his third term.
